Clan clean up

Now pick the bones out of this one
Games won minus games lost ,times 2,plus games drawn,Multiplied by 25% of a clans membership
This will encourage bigger clans and bigger challenges
And also be a lot fairer than we have at present

Originally posted by @padger
I am already leader of the Internationals
But that doesn't stop me from having one man challenges

No worries, you do that. Enjoy.

Originally posted by @padger
Now pick the bones out of this one
Games won minus games lost ,times 2,plus games drawn,Multiplied by 25% of a clans membership
This will encourage bigger clans and bigger challenges
And also be a lot fairer than we have at present

Pythagoras's theorem?

Originally posted by @padger
Now pick the bones out of this one
Games won minus games lost ,times 2,plus games drawn,Multiplied by 25% of a clans membership
This will encourage bigger clans and bigger challenges
And also be a lot fairer than we have at present

Since the 200 points rating barrier was introduced. Not many huge challenges happen.
I would make it no points for a draw.
One player on here seems to have a very high percentage of draws.
You only have to win one game to get two points.
Time to close that loop hole

Using my formula this would be the change assuming that there only 5 in each clan

5 - 5 = 5 -- 5 5.25 -- 5.25
6 - 4 = 10 -- -10 7.5 -- 4
7 - 3 = 10 -- -10 8.75 -- 3.75
8 - 2 = 10 -- -10 10 -- 2.5
9 - 1 = 10 -- -10 11.25 -- 1.25

Surely this is much fairer

Originally posted by @padger
Using my formula this would be the change assuming that there only 5 in each clan

5 - 5 = 5 -- 5 5.25 -- 5.25
6 - 4 = 10 -- -10 7.5 -- 4
7 - 3 = 10 -- -10 8.75 -- 3.75
8 - 2 = 10 -- -10 10 -- 2.5
9 - 1 = 10 -- -10 11.25 -- 1.25

Surely this is much fairer

Man, your going to have to get over it and get on with it. You can't dwell on what could be. Personally I like my suggestion a lot better

Originally posted by @padger
Using my formula this would be the change assuming that there only 5 in each clan

5 - 5 = 5 -- 5 5.25 -- 5.25
6 - 4 = 10 -- -10 7.5 -- 4
7 - 3 = 10 -- -10 8.75 -- 3.75
8 - 2 = 10 -- -10 10 -- 2.5
9 - 1 = 10 -- -10 11.25 -- 1.25

Surely this is much fairer

Short answer no.
Why should losers get any points?

Originally posted by @roma45
Short answer no.
Why should losers get any points?

Can't even work out what he's going on about. Was that carry the one after differentiating the derivative times cos 40 degrees while doing the macarena and humming my sweet lord?

Originally posted by @roma45
Short answer no.
Why should losers get any points?

You do
Have you got a patch over both eyes ?

Originally posted by @radioactive69
Can't even work out what he's going on about. Was that carry the one after differentiating the derivative times cos 40 degrees while doing the macarena and humming my sweet lord?

Oh
I see I thought I was corresponding with intelligent people not some one who I have to take by the hand and walk them through it
You see in the first two numbers is how it is now and the second two numbers would be how it would be if my proposal was taken
For Roma as he has a job seeing with his eyes in patches the fourth number is for the winners of the losing clan
Who get nothing as things stand

Originally posted by @padger
You do
Have you got a patch over both eyes ?

Why should the losers get and points?

Why not just give everyone a hundred points just for playing.

Originally posted by @roma45
Why should the losers get and points?

Why not just give everyone a hundred points just for playing.

I would have though that as a leader of a clan that has only won just over a quarter of the challenges you have taken you would be grateful for any points

Originally posted by @padger
I would have though that as a leader of a clan that has only won just over a quarter of the challenges you have taken you would be grateful for any points

I play for fun
Why would I want points from losing a challenge?.
You seem to want failure rewarded
Arsenal fan?

I don't see why a losing clan should get points either - maybe a 0 instead of negative points but then some clans wont play as many games as the risk isn't as great and some could get complacent.

As has been said before you cant please everyone.

Awaiting thumbs down for this one!

Originally posted by @silverstriker
I don't see why a losing clan should get points either - maybe a 0 instead of negative points but then some clans wont play as many games as the risk isn't as great and some could get complacent.

As has been said before you cant please everyone.

Awaiting thumbs down for this one!

I can't think of any competition in the world where losers get points
The minus points was voted in to stop the large clans having an advantage. Easier to get a thousand points if they play ten thousand games
The minus has to stay.


I just gave you a quick thumb up to counteract your thumb down stalker