19 Mar '18 23:51>
@padger -- If it's any consolation, The Internationals are well ahead of Cawdor in net points so far this year.
Originally posted by @caesar-saladI don't really care where we finish in this stupid set up
@padger -- If it's any consolation, The Internationals are well ahead of Cawdor in net points so far this year.
Originally posted by @roma45Makes as much sense as you do
Net points system
Best idea ever
Congratulations RHP
Originally posted by @padgerThanks for the compliment
Makes as much sense as you do
Originally posted by @roma45Why should I
Thanks for the compliment
I notice you never replied to my posts showing other games as examples for losing points.
.net points are here to stay
Originally posted by @padgerWhy should you????
Why should I
It's on every result for all to see
Originally posted by @roma45The losing in all of theses games is a by product
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
A small selection of games where you lose what you already have won.
Originally posted by @padgerThe argument you put forward has nothing to do with how many games don't adopt a net system
The losing in all of theses games is a by product
Here are just a few that do not have this stupid rule
Snooker.Billiards.Hockey.Ice Hockey.Volley Ball.Football.American Football.Cricket.Baseball.Rugby Union.Rugby League.Bowls.Curling.Dominoes.Cribbage.
Originally posted by @roma45I will continue to play these stupid rules and keep complaining about them until someone realises that I am correct
The argument you put forward has nothing to do with how many games don't adopt a net system
You clearly stated no other game in the world does it.
I proved you wrong as usual .
If you don't want to lose by product just don't play a system voted for and supported by almost every one
Originally posted by @padgerNever going to happen.
I will continue to play these stupid rules and keep complaining about them until someone realises that I am correct
Originally posted by @caesar-saladOK well take it to the parks and cafes not on a site like this
The gambling examples remind me that chess in real life is also often played for stakes, in coffee houses and city parks. In those games, there's a net win for one and a net loss for the other.
Originally posted by @caesar-saladBest example yet proving the existence of something Padger thinks does not exist apart from RHP,
The gambling examples remind me that chess in real life is also often played for stakes, in coffee houses and city parks. In those games, there's a net win for one and a net loss for the other.