06 Mar '18 15:21>1 edit
Originally posted by @roma45had they combined the two I would agree that it would have been a majority
Exactly the same only one had an extra add on
Majority was reached
it's just a technical dispute
I'll concede
Originally posted by @roma45had they combined the two I would agree that it would have been a majority
Exactly the same only one had an extra add on
Majority was reached
Originally posted by @lemondropCall it a draw 😉
had they combined the two I would agree that it would have been a majority
it's just a technical dispute
I'll concede
Originally posted by @roma45How many were asked to vote ?
112 voted .
27 option one annual net points .
36 option two annual net points and punish cheats
Option one and two were basically the same thing.
SO 63 out of 112 is s MAJORITY.
Originally posted by @padgerEvery clan leader got a vote.
How many were asked to vote ?
Were the reasons for the vote explained exactly ?
Were the voters explained that net points is actually a load of rubbish or were they talked over by you ?
Originally posted by @padgerALL clan leaders that were active were asked to vote.
How many were asked to vote ?
Were the reasons for the vote explained exactly ?
Were the voters explained that net points is actually a load of rubbish or were they talked over by you ?
Originally posted by @shortcircuitIf they do not make sense then no matter what you say they are rubbish
ALL clan leaders that were active were asked to vote.
I believe all but 2 voted as well.
The votes were tabulated and a clear majority existed.
Net points have only been a load of rubbish to you. Everyone else understands them.
If you will recall, we used to decide the champion by gross points.
A bunch of leaders who didn't want to play as many ...[text shortened]... ou should have asked.
If you weren't the leader at the time, then why are you sounding off now?
Originally posted by @padgerInstead of playing 5 v 5
If they do not make sense then no matter what you say they are rubbish
If you can explain to me how a clan challenge with 5 players ends up 6-4 and the clan with 6 gets 10 points and the clan with 4 gets minus 10 points and if they were individual games the score would have been 6 - 4 I will accept the system but because they are two different scores I cannot
Originally posted by @roma45So you agree the system is rubbish
Instead of playing 5 v 5
Just play 5 individual challenges
Problem solved
Originally posted by @padgerThe system is fine
So you agree the system is rubbish
Originally posted by @roma45Exactly !!
Instead of playing 5 v 5
Just play 5 individual challenges
Problem solved