Originally posted by @wolfe63 I think I understand what Uzless has attempted to say. But, I could be wrong.
A more beneficial way of patronizing the Arts is to support them through active public engagement. (Or, in other words, by spending money.)
here here my good boy. i made no claim about the musicians who made the music. not at all.
My derision lies with the couch surfers claiming they enjoy art by sitting on their rotting stinking fart laden faux leather chair thinking that they are enlightened because Spotify played them a Mumford and Sons song.
Sit on one's couch, in your home, alone, with a volume remote control in your hand....Music is delivered to you and while still good, it is spoon fed in most cases.
Whereas, real Art, one must go out and obtain, immerse ones' self in it.
Originally posted by @stellspalfie Art cares little about the bus journey there.
Oh where are my fellow elites? It's so hard to be surrounded by the dredges. Communication resulting in understanding is a virtual impossibility with the simpletons who are given a keyboard and the freedom to press "post".
Art cares not, but this is not the thrust of thread.
The point is about the art viewer (or listener for the spotify generation). Art is meant to be an immersion. It's not meant to be delivered in modified data packets sent through an Apache server via a network router after being compressed into a signal sent via fibre optics to an analog receiver and manipulated via the stereo systems amplifier and tuner settings while the vacuum is running and the football game is on the tv.
"Oh where are my fellow elites? It's so hard to be surrounded by the dredges. Communication resulting in understanding is a virtual impossibility with the simpletons who are given a keyboard and the freedom to 'press post'."
Uhhhhmmm... not an elite post: Long gaze in mirror required.
Originally posted by @uzless Oh where are my fellow elites? It's so hard to be surrounded by the dredges. Communication resulting in understanding is a virtual impossibility with the simpletons who are given a keyboard and the freedom to press "post".
Art cares not, but this is not the thrust of thread.
The point is about the art viewer (or listener for the spotify generation) ...[text shortened]... ems amplifier and tuner settings while the vacuum is running and the football game is on the tv.
What are the acceptable formats for listening to music?
Originally posted by @wolfe63 "Oh where are my fellow elites? It's so hard to be surrounded by the dredges. Communication resulting in understanding is a virtual impossibility with the simpletons who are given a keyboard and the freedom to 'press post'."
Uhhhhmmm... not an elite post: Long gaze in mirror required.
oh come on....that was a classic put down deserving of praise and smiles.
Originally posted by @stellspalfie What are the acceptable formats for listening to music?
try to keep. i know its hard.
the argument is that music is art for lazy people. If you can't understand the points, then don't expect anyone to draw the lines between them for you.
Now be gone, or I shall taunt you a second time...
Originally posted by @uzless try to keep. i know its hard.
the argument is that music is art for lazy people. If you can't understand the points, then don't expect anyone to draw the lines between them for you.
Now be gone, or I shall taunt you a second time...
Maybe I'm not being clear enough for you...Do you also consider live music non-immersive, lazy art?...Oh and your father smells of elderberries!!
Originally posted by @stellspalfie Maybe I'm not being clear enough for you...Do you also consider live music non-immersive, lazy art?...Oh and your father smells of elderberries!!
No commment.
All points made thus far have been to refute post 6.