13 Feb '09 16:11>3 edits
Originally posted by Scriabin============================================
BTW, I used to enjoy just about every piece of classical music I got to hear.
No longer the case. It has become especially clear listening during the day in the office to WETA that there is too much repetition or self reference in the works of a lot of baroque and classical period composers. Too much of the same thing written over and over again -- like he same week.
One begins to suspect that WETA really prefers pieces in a major key --
BTW, I used to enjoy just about every piece of classical music I got to hear.
===========================================
I like to go to a good library and spend five hours choosing stuff I want to sample.
===============================================
No longer the case. It has become especially clear listening during the day in the office to WETA that there is too much repetition or self reference in the works of a lot of baroque and classical period composers. Too much of the same thing written over and over again -- like the thousand and one Vivaldi pieces that sound not enough different to keep me enchanted any longer. But I don't dislike Vivaldi, I just don't want quite so much of him, I guess. And Telemann, there's another one I can hear less often. Why don't they play more Handel?
=========================================
Baroque I am warming up to little by little. No rush.
I have always liked Bach's keyboard music more than most else from him. WETA is, imo, way too heavy on Baroque.
Listening to the lectures of Robert Greenberg on vary music history subjects has caused me this year to a be a little more opened to Baroque composers rarely heard.
With WETA you can almost predict when the next selection will be either Telemann or Vivaldi.
======================================
I will say that WETA has helped me renew my admiration and appreciation for Haydn.
================================
Haydn was the first of my favorite composers.
But he gets plenty of air time. And I'd prefer that some of it be used to introduce some other composers.
Then again I am probably a little elites about it.
I like all of his London symphonies, practically all of his Paris symphonies. There are some gems among the 70s, and some great earlier symphonies among the 22 - 50 group.
============================================
You will note that among the top 90 hits, only Dvorak's 8th and 9th appear. Although I've written them more than once, they do not play his 7th in D minor.
=========================================
The 7th is great. Go back down to hear the 6th and the 5th also. Of couse the 8th and 9th are regular staples for the Western concert hall.
===========================================
It came, therefore, as something of a surprise that while WETA still won't play it, both the National Symphony and the Baltimore Symphony had Dvorak's 7th on their programs in the same week.
==========================================
Makes no sense to me either why WETA won't play it more.
In fact it makes no sense that they would not play with Dvorak some of the symphonies of Kurt Atterburg like his 1rst and 2nd symphony.
Neither do I understand why they won't play more of the music of Arnald Bax or Edward Tubin.
I was blown away by the Estonian Eduard Tubin's 4th and 5th symphonies. The one called the Idyllic is georgeous. And the other is called the Legendary.
I like his first symphony too.
Years ago there was a chance that you might hear a Tubin symphony in the DC area. Not lately. I guess it just doesn't sell.
But its not Tubin's fault. I can tell you that.
--