03 Mar '08 07:03>1 edit
Ever since I started high school, my teachers have sought fiercely to inculcate me with their rule-book to good writing. To name a few of their rules:
- Avoid "ing" verbs (a rule echoed by Virginia Woolf in Orlando when he/she describe them as "the devil."😉
- Use more verbs than adjectives
- Avoid cliches
- Write in the active voice, not the passive.
- Vary sentence length
Can anyone add to or challenge that list? In fact, the more important question is, Is there such thing as good writing? Can we evaluate the merit of any writing-style? Or is good writing relative to the reader?
I personally think that there is such thing as good and bad writing. Good writers are able to formulate their ideas succinctly and economically; they use words with precision to convey ideas and evoke feelings. If the writing fails to achieve that, then what is the point?
- Avoid "ing" verbs (a rule echoed by Virginia Woolf in Orlando when he/she describe them as "the devil."😉
- Use more verbs than adjectives
- Avoid cliches
- Write in the active voice, not the passive.
- Vary sentence length
Can anyone add to or challenge that list? In fact, the more important question is, Is there such thing as good writing? Can we evaluate the merit of any writing-style? Or is good writing relative to the reader?
I personally think that there is such thing as good and bad writing. Good writers are able to formulate their ideas succinctly and economically; they use words with precision to convey ideas and evoke feelings. If the writing fails to achieve that, then what is the point?