Hillary Clinton may win the primaries but I don't think that this country can take another clinton nonetheless a bush. I'm not a democrat but I hope that Obama beats her fat butt out of the polls.
For the GOP Gulliani (forgive my spelling) may fall behind Mcain eventually because of his stand on a few major issues.
I would like to see John Mcain as our next persident.
John McCain hasn't got a cat in hell's chance, his campaign has been flatlining for months. I'm amazed by the poor quality of the Republicans this time: normally they have an embarrassment of riches, but this time it looks like Romney is the nearest thing they have to a polished candidate. Fred Thompson would be their ideal desperation candidate, but his outsider act is just too patently phoney to win over the electorate.
The Dems must be over the moon - it really doesn't matter if it's Clinton, Edwards or Obama; there's a more-or-less agreed agenda and three candidates who will be attractive to the centre. I'm sure the Republicans are hoping beyond hope that the electorate will reject minority and female candidates and forget about Bush's disastrous legacy, but they have nothing active to oppose them with: whoever is facing them is going to find it very, very difficult.
Originally posted by Judah1I am in a discussion group for world politic lunatics like myself. You have only my word for this, but I predicted Hillary Clinton would be the 2008 winner for office of President of USA in 2001. I now feel more confident than ever.
Hillary Clinton may win the primaries but I don't think that this country can take another clinton nonetheless a bush. I'm not a democrat but I hope that Obama beats her fat butt out of the polls.
For the GOP Gulliani (forgive my spelling) may fall behind Mcain eventually because of his stand on a few major issues.
I would like to see John Mcain as our next persident.
a) Female vote will cross political lines
b) Undecideds will vote Clinton to get Bill back in White House.
c) Bush has ruled more as a Democrat than Republican on ALL domestic issues (except taxes) and spent (more than Clinton) alienating the base. Alienated Base = No $ Contributions
d) CLINTON POLITICAL MACHINE...Just wait to see what this behemoth produces next year. Hillary's Democrat oponents cannot dig a hole deep enough to hide in. BLITZ!!!!! 🙂
Originally posted by MacSwainI agree on point d. she is already making Obama look foolish... especially after he called her the lite version of bush/chaney 🙂
I am in a discussion group for world politic lunatics like myself. You have only my word for this, but I predicted Hillary Clinton would be the 2008 winner for office of President of USA in 2001. I now feel more confident than ever.
a) Female vote will cross political lines
b) Undecideds will vote Clinton to get Bill back in White House.
c) Bush has ...[text shortened]... t year. Hillary's Democrat oponents cannot dig a hole deep enough to hide in. BLITZ!!!!! 🙂
Originally posted by kirksey957I hope so!... also will Bill be in charge of 'entertaining' the wives of the leaders that Hilary is meeting with?
I have a question assuming Hillary Clinton wins. What will be the etiquette of the press when it comes to medical procedures such as a pap smear or a mammogram? Will they report these as they did Bush's colonoscopy?
Originally posted by kirksey957Mrs. Clinton will keep her medical check-ups private, just as husband Bill did to keep his genital herpes out of the press.
I have a question assuming Hillary Clinton wins. What will be the etiquette of the press when it comes to medical procedures such as a pap smear or a mammogram? Will they report these as they did Bush's colonoscopy?
Anyway, she is more likely to require a prostate exam than a pap smear...😉
Originally posted by kirksey957At least you have to give Bush credit for not keeping his medical treatments private. Of course, there were no secrets to be kept regarding his colonoscopy. Everyone and everything has been up his ass since day one. Including his own head! 🙄
What will be the etiquette of the press when it comes to medical procedures such as a pap smear or a mammogram? Will they report these as they did Bush's colonoscopy?
