@cliff-mashburn saidI googled it.
Yes I can, and so can you if you care to look.
All I found was the basic discussion on top sports levels (FIFA and that sort if thing) discussing it (and rightly so).
I can’t find any discussion about it on amature level, redneck level or anywhere near the anxiety shown on this site.
And on this site, again, only Americans.
Same as toilets. Nobody in the real world cares.
The post that was quoted here has been removedShav, this issue is not about 'giving a dam' about it. A guy living in a montana shack might not give a dam about it. You can approach it from that angle?
Or you can respond normally to the question. What does Shav think about men on girls' teams? And why or why not? Geez, we get tired of you hillbillies flying off the handle. Pretend we are chatting.
Sonhouse: You have already said it is alright. Good for you. But you have NOT said if it would OK with you if your 10-year old is competing with one in a swim meet.
Can everyone see that I am tryiing to make this a normal conversation? If we were sitting at starbuck's, I doubt Sonhouse would launch into his time n Afghanistan, and would respond to his forum friends in kind.
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidDude. We’ve been over this 10 times now.
Shav, this issue is not about 'giving a dam' about it. A guy living in a montana shack might not give a dam about it. You can approach it from that angle?
Or you can respond normally to the question. What does Shav think about men on girls' teams? And why or why not? Geez, we get tired of you hillbillies flying off the handle. Pretend we are chatting.
So ...[text shortened]... t Sonhouse would launch into his time n Afghanistan, and would respond to his forum friends in kind.
Within the spectrum of consequences to non-trans people, the sporting is the only discussion worth anything.
But, it’s not worth 10 threads in 6 months.
Especially because nobody seems to comprehend the question: if not in female or male sports, what then?
Except for extremist tropes: nothing. No solutions. Just the same old stupid posturing as usual.
But for the last time on this issue:
- yes. I think it is worthy of discussion within society.
- no. I’m not sure what the answer will be.
- mhmmm… people should stop taking sports so seriously and just treat sports like games. Monopoly or something.
And that’s basically that.
1 edit
@shavixmir saidRight, and I'll be dammed if I can figure out why.
1. There is no link there.
2. Suing... that is a major problem in the US. STOP IT. JUST STOP IT.
3. Funny how with trans-things being everywhere, it's seemingly only in the US that this is such an issue.
The real rub is in sports and school lavatories.
@shavixmir saidDISCUSSION WITHIN SOCIETY. A ‘Societalist’ weighs in about society discussions. We are individuals discussing a subject that has Never been resolved. Nuthin to do with your society. Anyway, it is impossible for a society to speak to another society. Man on man, don’t you know.
Dude. We’ve been over this 10 times now.
Within the spectrum of consequences to non-trans people, the sporting is the only discussion worth anything.
But, it’s not worth 10 threads in 6 months.
Especially because nobody seems to comprehend the question: if not in female or male sports, what then?
Except for extremist tropes: nothing. No solutions. Just the same old ...[text shortened]... so seriously and just treat sports like games. Monopoly or something.
And that’s basically that.
Does Shav believe that men should play in girls’ sports? Just Shavixmir answer please, not a society. Thanks.
@earl-of-trumps saidPlease avoid changing subjects. And do you think it is ok for men/boys to compete in women’s sport, Earl?
Right, and I'll be dammed if I can figure out why.
The real rub is in sports and school lavatories.
@averagejoe1 saidI do not think it is fair, of course not.
Please avoid changing subjects. And do you think it is ok for men/boys to compete in women’s sport, Earl?
right now, these transwomen can play for either team, the boys or the girls.
And that is just not right.
@earl-of-trumps saidThankyou. A vote, a comment, from Earl.
I do not think it is fair, of course not.
right now, these transwomen can play for either team, the boys or the girls.
And that is just not right.
Earl, can you maybe tell us why the liberals on this thread will not say one way or another? Except Sonhouse, who says it is OK for a man, Lea somebody , to compete against Riley Gaines, and for high school boys to compete against high school girls. Although there is a follow-up question on the table ,... what if the man/boy were competing against your daughter. Can you tell me why he will not answer that question?
@averagejoe1 saidI refer to my answer above. It literally answers your fukking question, you retarded rimjob of an incel.
DISCUSSION WITHIN SOCIETY. A ‘Societalist’ weighs in about society discussions. We are individuals discussing a subject that has Never been resolved. Nuthin to do with your society. Anyway, it is impossible for a society to speak to another society. Man on man, don’t you know.
Does Shav believe that men should play in girls’ sports? Just Shavixmir answer please, not a society. Thanks.
@cliff-mashburn saidObviously these places also have LGBTQ phobic incels too and these stories arise but we do not have enough of your kind for them to get any real national or political traction and if some of your ultra right wing phobic politicos were saying the things they say over here they would be thrown out of their respective political parties, because it would be a massive vote loser.
It's an issue in Europe/England/Canada and other countries as well.
Where did you get the idea that's it's a uniquely American problem?
It turns out you guys really are ‘exceptional’ just not in the way you think you are.
@shavixmir said"Not worthy of discussion ' and 'Not sure about the answer'. SHav says he is not sure about the anxwer. "Not sure about the answer". He says that the subject, which will ruin lives and change much of our inner world, is not worthy of discussion.
I refer to my answer above. It literally answers your fukking question, you retarded rimjob of an incel.
You libs can cast his response aside and go on talking about abortion and the not-insurrection, but please understand the plight of your common-sense Forum members who have to forge through such flake. Such flake, yes. You are all flake. At least he did not change the subject. He did lie, as. he says he answered the 'f.....g question, I will send this lie to Suzigirlanne's department.
@kevcvs57 saidAnother scared-to-answer forum member. If he did, he would (in his words) ' be thrown out of his gay forum party of losers", not a man among 'em.
Obviously these places also have LGBTQ phobic incels too and these stories arise but we do not have enough of your kind for them to get any real national or political traction and if some of your ultra right wing phobic politicos were saying the things they say over here they would be thrown out of their respective political parties, because it would be a massive vote loser.
It turns out you guys really are ‘exceptional’ just not in the way you think you are.
Why don't liberals answer questions? Could this be the answer? They would be thrown out, shunned??
@averagejoe1 saidOh. Listen to average Joe the wise; the knower of everything.
"Not worthy of discussion ' and 'Not sure about the answer'. SHav says he is not sure about the anxwer. "Not sure about the answer". He says that the subject, which will ruin lives and change much of our inner world, is not worthy of discussion.
You libs can cast his response aside and go on talking about abortion and the not-insurrection, but please understand ...[text shortened]... , as. he says he answered the 'f.....g question, I will send this lie to Suzigirlanne's department.
It is okay to not comprehend something or not be able to solve something.
@shavixmir saidHuh? We would rather hear you defend your comment that you are 'not sure what the answer would be', followed by your comment that you have already answered the question.
Oh. Listen to average Joe the wise; the knower of everything.
It is okay to not comprehend something or not be able to solve something.
Caught in a pillow-chewing momen,t knowing that Sue will come down on you for lying. Or, you still have time to answer the question.
Ask me a question. You know, this is all very telling. Conservatives have no problem answering questions, as we are not scared to. Libs will not answer questions where the answer would put them in disfavor with their lock-step comrades. That is, they are scared to.
@AverageJoe1
You are not scared to answer questions because you KNOW you have all the answers and that doesn't happen to involve that pesky word 'Empathy'.