@Cliff-Mashburn saidNot to worry, Marauder will ride in on his white horse. Forever with the answer!
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
2 edits
@Cliff-Mashburn saidThat's because your president is a worthless lying thieving pos who cannot be trusted with anything. This is a democracy; not a dictatorship as you worthless trumptards and your two false gods wish. I love it! 😀
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
this is judicial tyranny 😆 😆 😆 Bye bye trumpty poo.... LOL...
@KingDavid403 saidYa mean like these wonderful political activist judges ?
That's because your president is a worthless lying thieving pos who cannot be trusted with anything. This is a democracy; not a dictatorship as you worthless trumptards and your two false gods wish. I love it! 😀
this is judicial tyranny 😆 😆 😆 Bye bye trumpty poo.... LOL...
@Cliff-Mashburn saidNow? All of a sudden? This is high school civics Cliff. The system of government we have thrived under for several centuries now.
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
The only thing that's changed is an executive branch that wants to do illegal things constantly.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidBoo hoo get a tissue.
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidDistrict Court decisions to grant injunctions are appealable and higher courts often expedite such appeals; the Venezuelan migrants case reached the SCOTUS three weeks after the District Court ruling.
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
That seems hardly inappropriate given the scope of some of these unprecedented Executive Orders.
@Cliff-Mashburn
How many Trump supporters does it take to change a light bulb?
None - He says he’s done it and they all stand around in the dark applauding him.
@KingDavid403 saidExactly.
@Cliff-Mashburn
How many Trump supporters does it take to change a light bulb?
None - He says he’s done it and they all stand around in the dark applauding him.
@KingDavid403 saidLol
@Cliff-Mashburn
How many Trump supporters does it take to change a light bulb?
None - He says he’s done it and they all stand around in the dark applauding him.