Go back
94 Federal District US Judges

94 Federal District US Judges

Debates


Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.


@Cliff-Mashburn said
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
Not to worry, Marauder will ride in on his white horse. Forever with the answer!

2 edits

@Cliff-Mashburn said
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
That's because your president is a worthless lying thieving pos who cannot be trusted with anything. This is a democracy; not a dictatorship as you worthless trumptards and your two false gods wish. I love it! 😀

this is judicial tyranny 😆 😆 😆 Bye bye trumpty poo.... LOL...


@KingDavid403 said
That's because your president is a worthless lying thieving pos who cannot be trusted with anything. This is a democracy; not a dictatorship as you worthless trumptards and your two false gods wish. I love it! 😀

this is judicial tyranny 😆 😆 😆 Bye bye trumpty poo.... LOL...
Ya mean like these wonderful political activist judges ?


@Cliff-Mashburn said
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
Now? All of a sudden? This is high school civics Cliff. The system of government we have thrived under for several centuries now.

The only thing that's changed is an executive branch that wants to do illegal things constantly.


@Cliff-Mashburn said
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
Boo hoo get a tissue.


@Cliff-Mashburn said
Now all of a sudden, a president needs unanimous consent from all of them on any decision he makes. If just one commie/libtard far left simp judge disagrees, the action is frozen.
This is not Democracy; this is judicial tyranny.
District Court decisions to grant injunctions are appealable and higher courts often expedite such appeals; the Venezuelan migrants case reached the SCOTUS three weeks after the District Court ruling.

That seems hardly inappropriate given the scope of some of these unprecedented Executive Orders.


@Cliff-Mashburn
How many Trump supporters does it take to change a light bulb?
None - He says he’s done it and they all stand around in the dark applauding him.


@KingDavid403 said
@Cliff-Mashburn
How many Trump supporters does it take to change a light bulb?
None - He says he’s done it and they all stand around in the dark applauding him.
Exactly.


@KingDavid403 said
@Cliff-Mashburn
How many Trump supporters does it take to change a light bulb?
None - He says he’s done it and they all stand around in the dark applauding him.
Lol


Trump has the FBI arresting judges now

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.