23 Nov '16 14:14>1 edit
From Tom Friedman in yesterday's Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/opinion/at-lunch-donald-trump-gives-critics-hope.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0
emphasis mine
On an "only Nixon could go to China" theory, a politician with street cred in the right wing acknowledging the validity of climate change science could have game changing impacts on how the US deals with climate change. Obama could do only so much with a balky GOP-led Congress. But would the right so vigorously oppose climate change mitigation efforts by a Trump administration?
There are many decisions that President-elect Trump can and will make during the next four years. Many of them could be reversible by his successor. But there is one decision he can make that could have truly irreversible implications, and that is to abandon America’s commitment to phasing out coal, phasing in more clean energy systems and leading the world to curb CO2 emissions before they reach a level that produces a cycle of wildly unpredictable climate disruptions.
When asked where he stood on that climate change issue — which in the past he dismissed as a hoax — and last December’s U.S.-led Paris emissions-reduction accord, the president-elect did not hesitate for a second: “I’m looking at it very closely. … I have an open mind to it. We’re going to look very carefully. … You can make lots of cases for different views. … I will tell you this: Clean air is vitally important. Clean water, crystal-clean water is vitally important.”
Do you think climate change is caused by human activity?
“I think there is some connectivity,” Trump answered. It is not clear “how much,” and what he will do about it “depends on how much it’s going to cost our companies.” Trump said he would study the issue “very hard” and hinted that if, after study, he was to moderate his views, his voice would be influential with climate skeptics.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/opinion/at-lunch-donald-trump-gives-critics-hope.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0
emphasis mine
On an "only Nixon could go to China" theory, a politician with street cred in the right wing acknowledging the validity of climate change science could have game changing impacts on how the US deals with climate change. Obama could do only so much with a balky GOP-led Congress. But would the right so vigorously oppose climate change mitigation efforts by a Trump administration?