Now if the progressives had been in charge, I think these would have looked a tad bit different. They would have gone something like this.
1. Right to free speech, so long as it is politically correct and not "offensive".
2. Right to a free press, so long as both sides of the arguement are offered so as to be "fair". Otherwise is will not be allowed.
3. Right to free worship, so long as the ...[text shortened]... and seizure. The courts will then later tell you exactly if the state was "unreasonable".[/b]
well, would you rather have it like this:
1. right to free speech, so long as it is racist and offensive
2.right to free press, so long as it is heavily biased and dominated by the right.
3.right to free worship, so long as it is christian and also, all representatives of the people should claim they talk to God and receive instructions from him.
4.right to a trial by jury, so long as you have no right to defend yourself.
5.Freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, so that you can make home-made bombs without any trouble.
is that what you're proposing?