Go back
a threshold crossed

a threshold crossed

Debates

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147477
Clock
05 Aug 21

Biden is openly defying a scotus ruling that stealing private property from landlords is unconstitutional.

biden admitted the act is unconstitutional but will keep on doing it.

For the people here, sonhouse comes to mind, claiming Trump was a dictator, well here is an example of how a dictator works.

We are entering dangerous territory. The constitution is what makes us a free country. It now means nothing.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Aug 21
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
Biden is openly defying a scotus ruling that stealing private property from landlords is unconstitutional.

biden admitted the act is unconstitutional but will keep on doing it.

For the people here, sonhouse comes to mind, claiming Trump was a dictator, well here is an example of how a dictator works.

We are entering dangerous territory. The constitution is what makes us a free country. It now means nothing.
Keep in mind that the moratorium started during Trump's term, in March of 2020.

Why wasn't it "unconstitutional" then?

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
05 Aug 21

@vivify said
Keep in mind that the moratorium started during Trump's term, in March of 2020.

Why wasn't it "unconstitutional" then?
No because it was passed by congress. The current extension, against the SCOTUS ruling, was a fiat by the new director of the CDC, who has no legislative power.
Yet nothing is being done , so we are no better than a banana republic.
When congress ignores the SCOTUS we are truly screwed.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
05 Aug 21
1 edit

@dood111 said
No because it was passed by congress. The current extension, against the SCOTUS ruling, was a fiat by the new director of the CDC, who has no legislative power.
Yet nothing is being done , so we are no better than a banana republic.
When congress ignores the SCOTUS we are truly screwed.
Yeah I'm sure the kids that won’t have to sleep on the street are really fretting about a constitution and wealthy SCOTUS panel that would toss them on it.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Aug 21

@dood111 said
No because it was passed by congress. The current extension, against the SCOTUS ruling, was a fiat by the new director of the CDC, who has no legislative power.
Yet nothing is being done , so we are no better than a banana republic.
When congress ignores the SCOTUS we are truly screwed.
This is a really frustrating post from you.

When Trump defied the Constitution by trying to stop the certification of an election, no complaints from conservatives....even though SCOTUS dismissed Trump's claims of election fraud.

Now, when it's a matter of people becoming homeless, suddenly the opinion of SCOTUS matters? Inciting a riot to stop a election is the "good" way to ignore the Constitution, but keeping people from being homeless? Screw that, right?

That said, I'm in agreement that we shouldn't violate any laws or Supreme Court orders granted that they aren't in violation of civil rights (like when SCOTUS upheld slavery).

I don't know that much about the details of this issue, so I'll stay out this discussion.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147477
Clock
05 Aug 21

@vivify said
Keep in mind that the moratorium started during Trump's term, in March of 2020.

Why wasn't it "unconstitutional" then?
it was unconstitutional then, Trump didnt do it, an unelected cdc official did.
we have the govt taking property from private citizens unlawfully.
The states were given covid relief money that they still have most of left over. Let them pay for giving people a free ride.

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20416
Clock
05 Aug 21

@vivify
" Inciting a riot to stop a election is the "good" way to ignore the Constitution, but keeping people from being homeless? Screw that, right?"
-------------------------

Vivify, if you want the children to have a roof over their head, why don't you get it done the LEGAL way, PAY FOR IT out of your pocket.

Don't enslave others and call it a just cause

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Aug 21
3 edits

@earl-of-trumps said

Vivify, if you want the children to have a roof over their head, why don't you get it done the LEGAL way, PAY FOR IT out of your pocket.

Don't enslave others and call it a just cause
In that very post you quoted from, I agreed we should do things legally.

My problem is that conservatives don't care about laws being violated when it's done to benefit them; if it's to stop an election, ignore congressional subpoenas, violate the Emoluments Clause, conservatives are say nothing.

You pick and choose when to be outraged at laws not being followed; and you're always outraged when it comes to helping those in need, but never to when it comes to benefiting yourselves financially or politically.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
05 Aug 21

@dood111 said
No because it was passed by congress. The current extension, against the SCOTUS ruling, was a fiat by the new director of the CDC, who has no legislative power.
Yet nothing is being done , so we are no better than a banana republic.
When congress ignores the SCOTUS we are truly screwed.
The SCOTUS made no such ruling.

Something is being done; those who feel aggrieved by the CDC moratorium have filed suit and the legality of the action will be judged in the Federal courts, not by right wing internet posters.

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
05 Aug 21

@no1marauder said
The SCOTUS made no such ruling.

Something is being done; those who feel aggrieved by the CDC moratorium have filed suit and the legality of the action will be judged in the Federal courts, not by right wing internet posters.
SCOTUS upheld the rent moratorium only until it was supposed to end on July 31.
https://www.npr.org/2021/06/29/1003268497/the-supreme-court-leaves-the-cdcs-moratorium-on-evictions-in-place

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147477
Clock
05 Aug 21

@no1marauder said
The SCOTUS made no such ruling.

Something is being done; those who feel aggrieved by the CDC moratorium have filed suit and the legality of the action will be judged in the Federal courts, not by right wing internet posters.
fed corurt have ruled...

why do you ignore this?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/eviction-moratorium-about-end-yet-federal-relief-funds-largely-remain-n1275297

because biden bungled it?

didnt have no problem getting out that free stimulus money did they?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26751
Clock
05 Aug 21

@earl-of-trumps said
@vivify
" Inciting a riot to stop a election is the "good" way to ignore the Constitution, but keeping people from being homeless? Screw that, right?"
-------------------------

Vivify, if you want the children to have a roof over their head, why don't you get it done the LEGAL way, PAY FOR IT out of your pocket.

Don't enslave others and call it a just cause
Enslaving others used to be legal. Be careful...

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147477
Clock
05 Aug 21

@athousandyoung said
Enslaving others used to be legal. Be careful...
good thing republicans put an end to that isnt it?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26751
Clock
05 Aug 21

@mott-the-hoople said
good thing republicans put an end to that isnt it?
Yeah them New England Irish Catholic immigrants and their California allies did a good job slapping the South into submission

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
05 Aug 21

@Mott-The-Hoople
So it wasn't Biden who started this. So what drugs are you on NOW?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.