I will not bore you head-in-sand liberals over the months, but be advised that you have a real problem coming down the river.
Hunter's business partner, Devon Archer, is about to testify that Biden did in fact meet with Hunter biz partner. It will contradict Biden denials.
Here is the deal......When it happens, it will beg this question.....Is the sitting president of the United States
compromised by foreign adversaries, including China, because he profited from his son's shady business dealings while he was Vice President. If that is the case, and the whistleblowers say that it is, the media will no longer be able to avoid this story. It is easily far and away a much-bigger story than Watergate.
I will wait to send links so that you do not get jaded. Just the good stuff!
@averagejoe1 saidDevon Archer isn't going to testify that Joe Biden " profited from his son's shady business dealings while he was Vice President."
I will not bore you head-in-sand liberals over the months, but be advised that you have a real problem coming down the river.
Hunter's business partner, Devon Archer, is about to testify that Biden did in fact meet with Hunter biz partner. It will contradict Biden denials.
Here is the deal......When it happens, it will beg this question.....Is the sitt ...[text shortened]... han Watergate.
I will wait to send links so that you do not get jaded. Just the good stuff!
If anyone ever does give credible testimony to such an allegation, it will be the first time but since Republicans have been covering the same ground for at least 5 years without finding anything of the sort, I doubt they ever will.
@no1marauder saidYour first sentence may be right. I did not say he would. Please get it straight in your journal, and let us see how it threshes out.
Devon Archer isn't going to testify that Joe Biden " profited from his son's shady business dealings while he was Vice President."
If anyone ever does give credible testimony to such an allegation, it will be the first time but since Republicans have been covering the same ground for at least 5 years without finding anything of the sort, I doubt they ever will.
NO sense trying to predict the outcome. For example, Sonhouse became exhausted trying to get Trump for 6 or 7 years, ..."covering the same gound!!"
@averagejoe1 saidYour "whatboutism" fails; Trump is being prosecuted for things he either didn't do before 2020 or couldn't be charged because he was President at the time.
Your first sentence may be right. I did not say he would. Please get it straight in your journal, and let us see how it threshes out.
NO sense trying to predict the outcome. For example, Sonhouse became exhausted trying to get Trump for 6 or 7 years, ..."covering the same gound!!"
By contrast, the allegations against Biden are the same as they were at least 5 years ago.
@no1marauder saidWow. You fellers can sure make a pie out of a spare tire.
Your "whatboutism" fails; Trump is being prosecuted for things he either didn't do before 2020 or couldn't be charged because he was President at the time.
By contrast, the allegations against Biden are the same as they were at least 5 years ago.
@no1marauder saidthe allegations are the same, yes...the proof of bank records and witnesses has changed
Your "whatboutism" fails; Trump is being prosecuted for things he either didn't do before 2020 or couldn't be charged because he was President at the time.
By contrast, the allegations against Biden are the same as they were at least 5 years ago.
@mott-the-hoople saidHow much "proof" has been amassed that show any money from Hunter's supposedly shady dealing going to Joe in an illegal manner?
the allegations are the same, yes...the proof of bank records and witnesses has changed
Still zero.
@no1marauder saidCorrect. Thus my OP says I will wait before I bother you libs with a firestorm!
How much "proof" has been amassed that show any money from Hunter's supposedly shady dealing going to Joe in an illegal manner?
Still zero.
@averagejoe1 saidI will wait before I bother you libs with a firestorm!
Correct. Thus my OP says I will wait before I bother you libs with a firestorm!
I'm giddy with anticipation! 😴
@no1marauder said? The real timeline of Biden corruption began with the laptop. The laptop was confirmed to be 'true' some days before the election, by the way, but the criminal FBI kept that quiet. So that is when all this began, and allegations are 1000% more diff than they were at least 5 years ago. My God, Congressman Comer and Jim Jordan turn up more crap every day. The Burisma exec has only recently disclosed giving "$5M to Hunter and $5M to your dad'. Not 5 years ago. Yeah, it has been changing. If you fellers want to be 'up' when it hits the fan, you should be watching FOX
Your "whatboutism" fails; Trump is being prosecuted for things he either didn't do before 2020 or couldn't be charged because he was President at the time.
By contrast, the allegations against Biden are the same as they were at least 5 years ago.
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidNo the same allegation was made and referred to the Trump administration 5 years ago.:
? The real timeline of Biden corruption began with the laptop. The laptop was confirmed to be 'true' some days before the election, by the way, but the criminal FBI kept that quiet. So that is when all this began, and allegations are 1000% more diff than they were at least 5 years ago. My God, Congressman Comer and Jim Jordan turn up more crap every day. The Burisma e ...[text shortened]... has been changing. If you fellers want to be 'up' when it hits the fan, you should be watching FOX
"CNN previously reported that the allegations in the 1023 surfaced years ago as Giuliani was sharing information with the Justice Department during the Trump administration. Then-Attorney General Bill Barr tapped former Pittsburgh US Attorney Scott Brady to oversee an FBI investigation into a variety of claims Giuliani provided the department."
And again:
" there’s no evidence Joe Biden was involved in his son’s work for the Ukrainian energy company or ever received any payments."
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/20/politics/chuck-grassley-fbi-document/index.html
1 edit
@no1marauder saidWhen someone wrote that there 'was (is) no evidence', maybe there wasn't.......................then.
No the same allegation was made and referred to the Trump administration 5 years ago.:
"CNN previously reported that the allegations in the 1023 surfaced years ago as Giuliani was sharing information with the Justice Department during the Trump administration. Then-Attorney General Bill Barr tapped former Pittsburgh US Attorney Scott Brady to oversee an FBI investigati ...[text shortened]... ved any payments."
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/20/politics/chuck-grassley-fbi-document/index.html
The 2 whistleblowers might be evidence, don't you think? You know, hands-on operatives, ...in the room, you know?
And we haven't even heard from Hunter's partner yet, so, yeah, evidence is still forthcoming, you are so right. Of course, I wrote that in the OP, but you want to get out ahead of everyone in this soon-to-be long running thread, by just repeating my opening OP.
Un believable
PS: TRUMP?????? Is that you Sonhouse? Do you libs have any idea of what is happening all around your president?
@earl-of-trumps saidGee, if they could only find a law Joe Biden actually violated ..........................................
@AverageJoe1
I want to hear them say "No one is above the law" - now, lol
@no1marauder saidGo Vote Joe!!!! He is our last hope.
Gee, if they could only find a law Joe Biden actually violated ..........................................