Say what you will of Joseph, Mary, Jesus, the Holy Spirit and God. Make fun with crude remarks. Fool yourselves into believing you are superior, sophisticated, educated, above all the religious foolishness. Verbally masturbate each other giving tongue to shallow ideas that were ancient before you were born. But tell me this: how did the lives of an obscure man and woman in a backwater of the Roman Empire come to be remembered for 2,000 years? How did the son they raised manage to change the world?
Originally posted by mateuloseWhether or not you accept the notion of the Virgin Birth,
So basicly she was poor, had to survive, was a whore, but from the sounds of it, pretty smart. I'll give her some credit, 2000 years ago whoring usually meant certain death, especially when married, but she got good money from it, and she managed to make everyone beleive she was a saint carrying god's baby and even fooled her own husband, wow, that's i ...[text shortened]... as been dead several thousand years and she is still fooling, that's one smart sexy woman, lol.
there is no evidence to suggest that St Mary was a prostitute,
either contemporary to him or post-factol.
Two accounts refer to her relations (in one chosen, the other
forced, as I recall) with a Roman soldier; the Roman soldiers
were well known for rape.
Your post is only meant to raise ire amongst Christians, a
spiteful thing to do.
Nemesio
Originally posted by nemesioAnd Leda was just a swan ...
Whether or not you accept the notion of the Virgin Birth,
there is no evidence to suggest that St Mary was a prostitute,
either contemporary to him or post-factol.
Two accounts refer to her relations (in one chosen, the other
forced, as I recall) with a Roman soldier; the Roman soldiers
were well known for rape.
Your post is only meant to raise ire amongst Christians, a
spiteful thing to do.
Nemesio
Poor picked-upon sister, actually ...
Originally posted by mateulosenow this is reality great thoughts from different angle
There is a theory among historians that Christianity is obviously completely false, because "virgin" Mary, simply cheated on her husband. These historians argue that Joseph and Mary recently wed, and never had sex yet, yet Mary somehow got pregnant, and in any other time period, everyone knows scientificly what happened, but this was 2000 years ago, and ...[text shortened]... ou can't prove I'm right/wrong anymore then you can prove Jesus is the son of god right/wrong.
Originally posted by mateuloseWho said anything about adultery and prostitution . She probably loved Jo and boinked him . Nothing about money changing hands or her being unfaithful to him . And what's so wrong about that ? I'd respect the whole schtick more if I heard them say he was a poor bastard child who changed the world . Instead it has to be this virgin birth fiction , as if without this story the whole deal has no credibility .
So basicly she was poor, had to survive, was a whore, but from the sounds of it, pretty smart. I'll give her some credit, 2000 years ago whoring usually meant certain death, especially when married, but she got good money from it, and she managed to make everyone beleive she was a saint carrying god's baby and even fooled her own husband, wow, that's i ...[text shortened]... as been dead several thousand years and she is still fooling, that's one smart sexy woman, lol.