@Mott-The-Hoople saidIt's the job of the SCOTUS to put into effect the intent of the authors of the Constitution and laws passed pursuant to it.
It is not the job of scotus to consider “consequencies”.
They rule based on the law as written. You libs are some dumb fuks!
Those who wrote Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and then amended it in 1982 to override a previous SCOTUS ruling limiting it only to cases of provable intentional discrimination surely never anticipated that it would be interpreted in a way that would reduce minority representation.
@no1marauder saidHoly smokes
It's the job of the SCOTUS to put into effect the intent of the authors of the Constitution and laws passed pursuant to it.
Those who wrote Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and then amended it in 1982 to override a previous SCOTUS ruling limiting it only to cases of provable intentional discrimination surely never anticipated that it would be interpreted in a way that would reduce minority representation.
SCOTUS interprets the law as written and applies the legal tests that Congress created.
The court has to apply the statute within constitutional limits. the court can’t just ignore them to achieve a preferred result. Geez
If Congress believes the current interpretation is producing the wrong outcomes, it has the authority to revise the law again. That’s the constitutional balance: Congress writes the law, and the Court interprets it—not the other way around.
Try plain English and close your one-track posts….you leave inconvenient info out a lot.
Was your granny a contrarian? Has to come from somewhere
@sonhouse saidIt’s MayDay!!! shouldn’t you be locking arms in Chicago??!?!?
Are you fking KIDDING? The WHOLE idea is to FUK black votes and OF COURSE being a nice tame Trump propagandist and a flaming sociopath just like Trump then you back it totally, not a single blue county in Tenessee, YEA, you would say.
Do you know that May 1 is the day that the Russian celebrate communism. Don’t mean to get off the subject. You need to get your sign and get out on the street.!!!! down with America.
@AverageJoe1 saidCongress already corrected the same error the Court made in 1980 by amendment in 1982 only to have it repeat it this week by limiting the language Congress used beyond its intended purpose.
Holy smokes
SCOTUS interprets the law as written and applies the legal tests that Congress created.
The court has to apply the statute within constitutional limits. the court can’t just ignore them to achieve a preferred result. Geez
If Congress believes the current interpretation is producing the wrong outcomes, it has the authority to revise the law agai ...[text shortened]... ts….you leave inconvenient info out a lot.
Was your granny a contrarian? Has to come from somewhere
@no1marauder saidI don't understand what you say. Say it in plain english.
Congress already corrected the same error the Court made in 1980 by amendment in 1982 only to have it repeat it this week by limiting the language Congress used beyond its intended purpose.
You appear to fantasize that you sit in a symposium with a bunch of academics
Your statement does not 'stand alone' for us average forum readers
@AverageJoe1 saidTry reading the decision as well as Kagan's dissent. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf
I don't understand what you say. Say it in plain english.
You appear to fantasize that you sit in a symposium with a bunch of academics
Your statement does not 'stand alone' for us average forum readers
I can't teach law in Forum posts.
@no1marauder saidPlease don't. geez
Try reading the decision as well as Kagan's dissent. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf
I can't teach law in Forum posts.
As you have zero humor ( i don't mean haha humor) you will not be able to quit educating everyone
@no1marauder said“I can't teach law in Forum posts.”
Try reading the decision as well as Kagan's dissent. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf
I can't teach law in Forum posts.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤡😂😂😂😂😂😂
Let me teach you something…congress makes law, not the scotus
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThe law was passed 98-0 in the Senate. SCOTUS said we don't need it anymore. The southern states immediately cancelled elections and are now gerrymandering to eliminate black representation in Congress.
“I can't teach law in Forum posts.”
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤡😂😂😂😂😂😂
Let me teach you something…congress makes law, not the scotus
@AverageJoe1 saidYou won't be so flippant when gas in YOUR state is 8 bucks a gallon. You are literally insane if you think our economy is on fire, it is so good in your blind eyes.
It’s MayDay!!! shouldn’t you be locking arms in Chicago??!?!?
Do you know that May 1 is the day that the Russian celebrate communism. Don’t mean to get off the subject. You need to get your sign and get out on the street.!!!! down with America.
1 edit
@sonhouse saidFollow me, Funhouse, We have had to step back and clean up Iran, which Clinton, Bush and Obama left undone. Luckily we will hve that behind us soon, and thank Trump, that OUR KIDS WILL NOT HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT. You did mention in an earlier post that our kids will deal with the economics of society,.....I am merely saying, it will not be a nuclear problem for them.
You won't be so flippant when gas in YOUR state is 8 bucks a gallon. You are literally insane if you think our economy is on fire, it is so good in your blind eyes.
Cool. So, you here are upset about a few more weeks of gas prices. How bout being happy with everything else, and enjoy our defeat of Iran. We sacrifice for the good of no nukes in our children's futures.
So you see that gas increases are going to be short-lived. So will the Iranian cretins.
Remember, you will waste time, write 50 more posts about gas prices, and they will be down to $2.50. (not in CA 😆 )
Hey did you see where sue says that SCOTUS needs to consider the 'effects of a decision"' before they adjudicate??? The possible consequences?? Man, you guys sure like to be taken care of. Made happy.
And did you see where Marauder is suggesting that billionaires are.....well, something. What, maybe a scourge on society or something?? he never comes right out and says what he is saying. in plain English. Like YOU do!!! 😉
@Mott-The-Hoople saidCongress made a law in this case, the SCOTUS gutted it with a decision that flies in the face of the purpose of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
“I can't teach law in Forum posts.”
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤡😂😂😂😂😂😂
Let me teach you something…congress makes law, not the scotus
@no1marauder saidHow does this ruling violate sec 2?
Congress made a law in this case, the SCOTUS gutted it with a decision that flies in the face of the purpose of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.