@wildgrass saidEveyone mark in your journals that this poster, wildgrass, says Iran is winning.l
There's zero difference in the amount of time it would take Iran to make a nuke before the war vs after the war. Experts agree on this.
I ain't scared of them. Iran has been working on this since the 1980s, and the rest of the world has by and large been successful at monitoring. They couldn't hurt us before the war, but they are hurting us a lot now. In other words, Iran is winning.
@Rajk999 saidYou forgot the idiotic giggle.
You actually prefer Kamala 'word salad' Harris? You think this would have helped with Iran ..
“Iran is a country, but we don't live there, so it's not our country. And when we go there, we are in another country.” — Kamala Harris
You better off paying more for eggs and gas.
@AverageJoe1 saidWe've been here before, Joe, twice in recent history. Every Republican president always thinks this time will be different. It never is and won't be this time either. These wars aren't won by us. We're wasting money and ruining our credibility among allies.
Eveyone mark in your journals that this poster, wildgrass, says Iran is winning.l
@wildgrass saidYou’re on Trump will prevail.
We've been here before, Joe, twice in recent history. Every Republican president always thinks this time will be different. It never is and won't be this time either. These wars aren't won by us. We're wasting money and ruining our credibility among allies.
Do you remember that marauder was saying at the outset that there has been no proof of uranium or nuclear development? Yet in the news today they say that there is! …. when they’re talking about the reasons that the war has not ended yet ‘because they will not give up their development of nuclear energy’. Point being that they are indeed nuclear maniacs.
2 edits
@no1marauder saidOh. So why don’t say what is true, and that many many Americans have profited greatly from his leadership and his reductions in taxes, etc. etc…….. while at the same time you seem to not have caught the train, and you’re not doing so well. So tell everyone here that you’re not doing well in the new economy?
Most he's failed to do, the ones he's actually done are detrimental to the country.
Why not? A real puzzle to me. You actually, instead of wasting your time on this Internet, should be positioning yourself for when the IRAN thingy thing is over, and it will be over….., the economy will take off. Do you not want to be on the train THEN?!??
Costs incurred will be recouped in the scheme of oil movement. Are you one of those ninnies that frets over a Fritz over an extra $.10 per gallon??
@AverageJoe1 saidIt's not possible to prevail. The best, very best, case scenario is to put Obama's nuclear proliferation deal with Iran back into place. However, that's not something Iran is willing to do anymore because we keep bombing them during negotiations and ripping up deals we already signed.
You’re on Trump will prevail.
Do you remember that marauder was saying at the outset that there has been no proof of uranium or nuclear development? Yet in the news today they say that there is! …. when they’re talking about the reasons that the war has not ended yet ‘because they will not give up their development of nuclear energy’. Point being that they are indeed nuclear maniacs.
@wildgrass saidRight. So this post is moot? So, the 'very best' is to follow the plan of the 77M throng thru their president, as he knocks off one promise after another. You see, I , ME, want him to do all that he is doing. So, you think is a failure 😆 (actually you sound socialist-horn that he is a failure) when you know he is doing a great job. You know he is doing right, but you have to say otherwise. Who are you scared of... Suzianne?
It's not possible to prevail. The best, very best, case scenario is to put Obama's nuclear proliferation deal with Iran back into place. However, that's not something Iran is willing to do anymore because we keep bombing them during negotiations and ripping up deals we already signed.
Here is an easy one. Was he right to lay off 300,000 fed employees, saving all that money? (Note the fed has suffered naught).
@AverageJoe1 saidI thought the layoff should have been targeted at real redundancy, waste etc. and not cancer researchers. How'd he lay off all those people and still spend more money than Biden?
Right. So this post is moot? So, the 'very best' is to follow the plan of the 77M throng thru their president, as he knocks off one promise after another. You see, I , ME, want him to do all that he is doing. So, you think is a failure 😆 (actually you sound socialist-horn that he is a failure) when you know he is doing a great job. You know he is doing right, ...[text shortened]... e right to lay off 300,000 fed employees, saving all that money? (Note the fed has suffered naught).
@wildgrass saidEvery single program Trump has cancelled with the stated idea to "save money" was usually a good program started as a benefit to the American people, he's turned around to be "useless, totally useless" and cancelled it. This is the problem with his administration. Many of these programs people depend on, especially those with limited means. Some are of massive benefit to all people, such as attempts at reducing the effects of climate change.
I thought the layoff should have been targeted at real redundancy, waste etc. and not cancer researchers. How'd he lay off all those people and still spend more money than Biden?
This right here is also the danger of being so 'anti-woke' that you fall asleep on what is supposed to be your primary job of protecting Americans. "Anti-woke" is just an excuse to reduce YOUR benefits so that more money can be shoveled UP the hill to the rich.
@wildgrass saidGet a researcher like Marauder on that one. I am not a numbers man. But historically all presidents spend more than the last guy.
I thought the layoff should have been targeted at real redundancy, waste etc. and not cancer researchers. How'd he lay off all those people and still spend more money than Biden?
Ha, think of how much your Dem president in 2028 will spend!!! Hold on to your hats! ... and to your savings accounts!! Or spend it all before 2026, cause govt will come down on your assets like white on rice.
But, everybody (except for the rich) will be all equal, so you will be,,,,,well, equal!!!!
Remember, socialism is for the People!, not for the Socialists.
@AverageJoe1 saidAnd you actually wonder why we call voting for Trump to be "voting against your best interests".
Right. So this post is moot? So, the 'very best' is to follow the plan of the 77M throng thru their president, as he knocks off one promise after another. You see, I , ME, want him to do all that he is doing. So, you think is a failure 😆 (actually you sound socialist-horn that he is a failure) when you know he is doing a great job. You know he is doing right, ...[text shortened]... e right to lay off 300,000 fed employees, saving all that money? (Note the fed has suffered naught).
These people who voted for Trump will be in dire straits (along with all of us, unfortunately) once he cancels their retirement benefits like Social Security and Medicare. They paid in, but they actually voted to have that money taken away from them. Thus, "voting against their best interests".
"Here is an easy one. Was he right to lay off 300,000 fed employees, saving all that money? (Note the fed has suffered naught)."
He and Musk (in an unelected role) have laid off more like 800,000 fed workers, many of them the most experienced of government workers, those who actually know how to do those jobs. He "saved" that money, but we're all paying for it every time we call the SS office or the IRS, expecting help with our problem, and we get the 'run-around' dealing with them, because the ones that are left are much worse at their jobs. I will say it again. Besides ruining these people's lives by firing them before they reach retirement age, the only thing Trump has "accomplished" with this bone-headed move is to make the entire Federal government into his own image, inept, ineffective, inefficient and just plain "horrible". He has accomplished his dearest dream of making Federal government suck.
@AverageJoe1 saidStop gaslighting us.
Oh. So why don’t say what is true, and that many many Americans have profited greatly from his leadership and his reductions in taxes, etc. etc…….. while at the same time you seem to not have caught the train, and you’re not doing so well. So tell everyone here that you’re not doing well in the new economy?
Why not? A real puzzle to me. You actually, instead of wa ...[text shortened]... oil movement. Are you one of those ninnies that frets over a Fritz over an extra $.10 per gallon??
Look at the polls.
The American people know what's up, and they're tired of it.
2 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidYou were bragging about him laying off the workers and saving money. Now you want me to ask someone else? It's a fair question to ask how it's possible to save money and spend more money?
Get a researcher like Marauder on that one. I am not a numbers man. But historically all presidents spend more than the last guy.
Ha, think of how much your Dem president in 2028 will spend!!! Hold on to your hats! ... and to your savings accounts!! Or spend it all before 2026, cause govt will come down on your assets like white on rice.
But, everybody ...[text shortened]... o you will be,,,,,well, equal!!!!
Remember, socialism is for the People!, not for the Socialists.
Normally, if workers are laid off, the idea is to reduce costs. It appears to me that these layoffs had nothing to do with that. Trump wanted to stop cancer research, not save money.
@Suzianne saidWhen I go out into the sunshine, I see a lot of content Americans, busy busy, restaurants full, cars going everywhere, softball at school, High school proms, buying dresses, laughing, horse races, gambling, vacations to Europe, all flights full to everywhere....where ARE they going!?!?!?
Stop gaslighting us.
Look at the polls.
The American people know what's up, and they're tired of it.
Living life, Americans, what opportunities have given them. The sky is the limit. Mamdani wants to stop all that for successful people, why dont you give us a thread on that. You know, the guys who create jobs. Mamdani cannot create jobs, he can only redistribute. Ahhhhh, dependence. happyhappyhappy