Originally posted by no1marauderthe statement by the IAEA re transparency and the refusal of Iran to curtail enrichment by the deadline doesn't correspond to your description of "minor" or "routine". it looks more like the runup to the invasion of Iraq. all they have to do is throw open the doors.
Yep, like Saddam sent all those WMDs to Syria.
As I said, the actual complaints by the IAEA are minor and such issues come up routinely. They are being blown out of proportion for propaganda purposes in an attempt to justify a war.
i supposed they need a hardened, underground enrichment facility so that the pizza boy can't swipe some uranium on his way out.
hey, this is the debates forum, not some dumb jury you can bamboozle with light words. "my client lah-de-dah-de-dah ..."
Originally posted by zeeblebotIt's useless talking to a parrot. Avoiding the "swiping of uranium" might be something useful. More likely, it's to protect the facility against bombing from lunatics like Israel and the US. The rest of your post is childish as usual and expected.
the statement by the IAEA re transparency and the refusal of Iran to curtail enrichment by the deadline doesn't correspond to your description of "minor" or "routine". it looks more like the runup to the invasion of Iraq. all they have to do is throw open the doors.
i supposed they need a hardened, underground enrichment facility so that the pizza boy ...[text shortened]... ot some dumb jury you can bamboozle with light words. "my client lah-de-dah-de-dah ..."
Originally posted by no1marauderthat's the kind of reply you make when you don't have a real answer.
It's useless talking to a parrot. Avoiding the "swiping of uranium" might be something useful. More likely, it's to protect the facility against bombing from lunatics like Israel and the US. The rest of your post is childish as usual and expected.