"Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says she is a sexual assault survivor"

@suzianne said
"Bigfoot" is unlikely.

Sad to say, in America, rape is not "unlikely".

So apparently you (and Duchess64?) would rather live in the world of the Salem witch trials where all one needs for a conviction is to point a finger at a person. Nice!!

But... let me guess,, today, these magical convictions can only be made by special people. and the accused can only be dastardly people.

uh huh.

@Duchess64
Earl of Trumps replied to Suzianne.

Note Earl of Trumps's usual ludicrous distortion of what was written.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez did NOT accuse any individual of sexually assaulting her.
There's NO chance whatsoever that any innocent person could be harmed by what she said.

I never said she was doing harm to any one human, but we are expected to believe her story when it may not be true.
AOC does prosper by revealing such an account. method to her madness...?

Statistics show that a large proportion of American women is sexually assaulted at least once.
--> Why do AOC-haters find it so unbelievable that AOC could be one of these victims?
-----------------------------------------

Because she is a liberal.

@earl-of-trumps said
So apparently you (and Duchess64?) would rather live in the world of the Salem witch trials where all one needs for a conviction is to point a finger at a person. Nice!!

But... let me guess,, today, these magical convictions can only be made by special people. and the accused can only be dastardly people.

uh huh.

And this is male privilege.

@earl-of-trumps said
@Duchess64
Earl of Trumps replied to Suzianne.

Note Earl of Trumps's usual ludicrous distortion of what was written.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez did NOT accuse any individual of sexually assaulting her.
There's NO chance whatsoever that any innocent person could be harmed by what she said.

I never said she was doing harm to any one human, but we are e ...[text shortened]... ne of these victims?[/i]
-----------------------------------------

Because she is a liberal.

The ONLY way this could be more insulting is if you had said, "Because she is a woman."

Both opinions are part and parcel of the Troglodyte opinions polluting this forum.

@Earl-of-Trumps
So you are also one of the morally bankrupt who says lets move on from Jan 6, boys will be boys.

Tell me, what was your reaction a month later to 9/11?
Did you say, let's move one, nothing to see here?

Can you tell me why the republican senators didn't even WATCH the 13 minute video on this impeachment?

Tell me this: Do you think Trump incited the riots?

@suzianne said
The ONLY way this could be more insulting is if you had said, "Because she is a woman."

Both opinions are part and parcel of the Troglodyte opinions polluting this forum.

If trump or any Republican made unsubstantiated charges against someone, such as Joe Biden in Ukraine, you get pissy mad.

imagine that. "consistency" seems to be a short coming of you elitists of the Liberal hoo-dee-hahha cult

@sonhouse
So you are also one of the morally bankrupt who says lets move on from Jan 6, boys will be boys.

Go truck yourself. you start out by putting insulting words in my mouth, AGAIN, go truck yourself.
--------------------

Tell me, what was your reaction a month later to 9/11?
Did you say, let's move one, nothing to see here?
----
Pretty well convinced it was an inside job.

Can you tell me why the republican senators didn't even WATCH the 13 minute video on this impeachment?

No, I never asked the Repubs, I am not their spokesman, either

Tell me this: Do you think Trump incited the riots?

No.

heh you still engaging that ashole?

@earl-of-trumps said
If trump or any Republican made unsubstantiated charges against someone, such as Joe Biden in Ukraine, you get pissy mad.

imagine that. "consistency" seems to be a short coming of you elitists of the Liberal hoo-dee-hahha cult

The key there is "unsubstantiated".

AOC was charging no one, and what she said was not "unsubstantiated".

@zahlanzi said
heh you still engaging that ashole?

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

I keep waiting for that needle in the haystack.

@earl-of-trumps said

Tell me this: Do you think Trump incited the riots?

No.

No? What?

This wasn't even a freaking phone call.

There is plain as day, blatant video of him inciting the crowd, AND rioters saying they are following Trump's orders.

This should be a slam-dunk. Instead, we have people with plain and simple "Trump derangement syndrome" who think Trump was right? That he wasn't trying to get his people to violate the sanctity of Congress and overturn a valid election? How dim can you people be?