01 Apr '11 22:45>
America is on a very wrong path in the Middle East. There is far too much American military involvment in that area, and it needs to end very soon. America does not have the resources to engage in one "police action" after another, nor is it advisable. Most people in the Middle East have a rather low opinion of America in general, and further military action will only aggervate an already difficult situation. I had hoped President Obama would have learned from the mistakes of George W Bush on this subject, but his action in Lybia shows that he has not.
It seems every time there is trouble in the world America seems hell bent on military action in nearly every case. This is not only unnecessary, but is fast becoming something the American taxpayer can no longer afford. It makes even less sense considering the record deficits the American government now has to pay.
America needs to be an equal partner with other nations to solve the problems of piracy and terrorism, rather than being the nation bearing most of the cost and manpower of military intervention, while America's "so called " allies play minor roles, and applaud from the sidelines.
America is digging a deeper hole for itself in the Middle East and around the world with far too much military intervention, the cost in dollars equipment, and lives is becoming too great and cannot be sustained. America needs to withdraw it's troops from the Middle East, South Korea, and other places around the world, and insist other countries play a larger roll in solving there own problems.
I am confident there will be cries from our beloved right wing calling me "soft on terror, "soft on communism", "soft on piracy", soft on ......I would point out to these misguided people if they are indeed gung ho on policing the world, they get off there collective butts, join the Army, and do something about it. I did, from 74-78. No wars at that time of course, but I did my part. I wonder how many "armchair generals" in the Republican ranks that are so keen to send in the troops, have served themselves? I'd guess the percentage is rather low!
😏
It seems every time there is trouble in the world America seems hell bent on military action in nearly every case. This is not only unnecessary, but is fast becoming something the American taxpayer can no longer afford. It makes even less sense considering the record deficits the American government now has to pay.
America needs to be an equal partner with other nations to solve the problems of piracy and terrorism, rather than being the nation bearing most of the cost and manpower of military intervention, while America's "so called " allies play minor roles, and applaud from the sidelines.
America is digging a deeper hole for itself in the Middle East and around the world with far too much military intervention, the cost in dollars equipment, and lives is becoming too great and cannot be sustained. America needs to withdraw it's troops from the Middle East, South Korea, and other places around the world, and insist other countries play a larger roll in solving there own problems.
I am confident there will be cries from our beloved right wing calling me "soft on terror, "soft on communism", "soft on piracy", soft on ......I would point out to these misguided people if they are indeed gung ho on policing the world, they get off there collective butts, join the Army, and do something about it. I did, from 74-78. No wars at that time of course, but I did my part. I wonder how many "armchair generals" in the Republican ranks that are so keen to send in the troops, have served themselves? I'd guess the percentage is rather low!
😏