An interesting question in our liberal society.

@AverageJoe1 said
Thankyou. See , it is not diffucult to answer simple questions on the Forum. A thumb-up for you, and I encourage others to give you one also.

What makes your ridiculous question "interesting" in your mind? I note you posed it in another thread, I gave you an answer that covers all such similar hypotheticals yet you decided to ignore my answer there and start a new thread with the exact same post.

Why?

@AverageJoe1 said
But, Why do y'all change scenario of an analogy? Most peculiar. Sue brought in Title IX? What in the hell? Zahlanzi, the question centers on 20 students, surely girls AND boys. Sue just throws that out there. Totally irrelevant, and. certainly unnecessary. I could scream.

i did't change any scenario

i said i am tired of your stupidity, genuine or fabricated, and i can't be bothered to write why your analogy is idiotic

@AverageJoe1 said
Thankyou. See , it is not diffucult to answer simple questions on the Forum. A thumb-up for you, and I encourage others to give you one also.

You know, Prevagen is supposed to help those with reading comprehension and attention span difficulties, you should try it for a couple of months, maybe you will be able to comprehend posts of more than two sentences, so for now sorry for the extremely long post.

@no1marauder said
What makes your ridiculous question "interesting" in your mind? I note you posed it in another thread, I gave you an answer that covers all such similar hypotheticals yet you decided to ignore my answer there and start a new thread with the exact same post.

Why?

It is intereseting, because I knew when I wrote it that the responses that would come back to the Forum would not answer the question directly. (ideally, yes or no). Further, I knew that you would all change the facts (actually, the one fact) of the analogy. Sophomores take test, should Seniors participate in a sophomore exercise. In his case, a test on statistics.
Should seniors participate? Should seniors participate? Should seniors participate? I thought that even suean and you would get the gist of the analogy.
Should a senior participate in a test on statistics given to sophomores. That is, the question .... the one question. So easy don't you know. No mention of other
entities.
Marauder....note for the record, that you actually refer here to a closed thread** about a 'similar hypothetical', as you call it. Similar or not, closed or not, any other thread is totally irrelevant to this thread.......................is it not? Marauder?

So, the actions of you fellers is why, to put it bluntly, is why this thread is so darn interesting. Or we can geehaw with sonhouse about his projections, prognoses, and prophecies.

Let us applaud Sueann for answering why inuits wear a lot of clothes. You think I am being cynical??? NO. Think about it, none of you ever answer questions. She did, like a bird taking its first flight out of the nest.

** Shall we pop back over the closed thread? you can start by telling why yoyu wrote about 20 posts about trans people and gender assignments etc, when the issue was not about that,,,,,,since, I do not even know what that is. Don't want to know. Should Men Be Allowed To Compete In Women't Sporting Events.

If you had, as you say, said men should not compete....it took you about 20 posts of writing about sex changes and trans and genders, sex, just sickening stuff. Hey if you had answered the question, (a yes or no)., then, why the 20 posts? What in the hell was that about??
Bring it. The thread was 'Man Wins...."

@Zahlanzi said
i did't change any scenario

i said i am tired of your stupidity, genuine or fabricated, and i can't be bothered to write why your analogy is idiotic

Zahlanzi will now tell us why it was idiotic, I assume. Even the libs will be curious, there is nothing idiotic about it, in my opinion. Tell us your opinion. Tell how it could not likely ever occur. That, a lower class could have an exam, and a senior saying he wants to participate. Tell us that that is idiocy. This is hardly part of the curriculum, it is on a Saturday, a contest on the world of Probability. Like a chess match.
Tell us. Why be ornery. Libs are so angry all the time .

@sonhouse said
You know, Prevagen is supposed to help those with reading comprehension and attention span difficulties, you should try it for a couple of months, maybe you will be able to comprehend posts of more than two sentences, so for now sorry for the extremely long post.

Thanks,. But, which long post? Not this one, it is just about right. All before it? Too long, lost in the shuffle. Who's on first!!

Did you see where my analogy OP has not been appreciated? Could Prevagen help me with that??

@AverageJoe1 said
It is intereseting, because I knew when I wrote it that the responses that would come back to the Forum would not answer the question directly. (ideally, yes or no). Further, I knew that you would all change the facts (actually, the one fact) of the analogy. Sophomores take test, should Seniors participate in a sophomore exercise. In his case, a test on statistics.
...[text shortened]... why the 20 posts? What in the hell was that about??
Bring it. The thread was 'Man Wins...."

You're a rotten liar. The other thread (which isn't closed BTW) postulated that men were entering women's events. When I asked for a single example of that happening, you said "Lia Thomas". She is not a man but a transgender woman.

And anyway here's what I said on the last page there:

"Is there a point to these ridiculous questions?

I have already given the relevant answer many times; who is eligible to compete in a competition should be up to the organizers of the competition (subject, of course, to relevant anti-discrimination laws).

Will that save you the trouble of making up another thousand silly hypotheticals?"

That answers your question in the OP.

@no1marauder said
You're a rotten liar. The other thread (which isn't closed BTW) postulated that men were entering women's events. When I asked for a single example of that happening, you said "Lia Thomas". She is not a man but a transgender woman.

And anyway here's what I said on the last page there:

"Is there a point to these ridiculous questions?

I have already given the rele ...[text shortened]... trouble of making up another thousand silly hypotheticals?"

That answers your question in the OP.

It has a prostate. It is a man. It is not a woman. You are pitiful with this obsession. Funny with all the 'workings', the makeup, of a human being, being sexed by nature at birth ....You ACTUALLY think that by snipping that which we call privates from his body makes him a woman. You actually think that.

Secondly, you say here that"" (it) should be up to the organizers"". What should be up to the organizers.? I was asking the 20 or so posters here if they (them, individually, the posters here, you, Mott, Moonbus, Zahalanzi, Earl, etc, ) think it is OK for a man to compete with a girl in a sport.
Few would say yes or no. So, I thought SHOuse is reasonable, I will ask him . He would not answer, either. Then you cover us up with links about the new Woke society an gender assignments, blah blah. YOu would not say yes or no.

NOW you write here that organizers make the decision. Fine let them make it, let the males-at-birth compete........................................................
But I asked you, little feller. Stand up!!!!!! What do YOU think? Libs..jesus.
You know, I do not see you saying 'This DOE policy 'should be up to Trump'. No, because it is inconvenient for you. In the case at hand, not letting your LGBTAQ run all over us is offffeennnnnnnssive to you. You take it personal.
So you take it personal if Trump decides, but you want the authoooorrrittiies to decide on males vs females. It fits your makeup.
Which way do you want it?

@AverageJoe1 said
It has a prostate. It is a man. It is not a woman. You are pitiful with this obsession. Funny with all the 'workings', the makeup, of a human being, being sexed by nature at birth ....You ACTUALLY think that by snipping that which we call privates from his body makes him a woman. You actually think that.

Secondly, you say here that"" (it) should be up to the organi ...[text shortened]... thoooorrrittiies to decide on males vs females. It fits your makeup.
Which way do you want it?

You're holding your breath until you turn blue insistence doesn't impress me. I already pointed out that the SCOTUS and 46 States recognize that people can change their sex. You and Donald Trump don't. I get it, but you're wrong and terribly ignorant. There's a lot more involved in gender affirming treatment and surgery than merely "snipping privates"; maybe if you'd ever actually read some of the links I provide you'd learn this.

I've answered the same question over and over and over again. I won't anymore.

@AverageJoe1 said
Zahlanzi will now tell us why it was idiotic, I assume. Even the libs will be curious, there is nothing idiotic about it, in my opinion. Tell us your opinion. Tell how it could not likely ever occur. That, a lower class could have an exam, and a senior saying he wants to participate. Tell us that that is idiocy. This is hardly part of the curriculum, it is on a ...[text shortened]... of Probability. Like a chess match.
Tell us. Why be ornery. Libs are so angry all the time .

are you too dumb to read? i just said i won't

@AverageJoe1 said
It has a prostate. It is a man. It is not a woman. You are pitiful with this obsession. Funny with all the 'workings', the makeup, of a human being, being sexed by nature at birth ....You ACTUALLY think that by snipping that which we call privates from his body makes him a woman. You actually think that.

Secondly, you say here that"" (it) should be up to the organi ...[text shortened]... thoooorrrittiies to decide on males vs females. It fits your makeup.
Which way do you want it?

The America we used to know is dissolving in a bucket of political manure led by a sociopathic madman intent on kingdom and all you can do is worry about fuuking GONADS?
With people like you in charge we DESERVE to lose our democracy, which I put up as a THOUSAND TIMES more immediate than any of your gender bender games.

@no1marauder said
You're holding your breath until you turn blue insistence doesn't impress me. I already pointed out that the SCOTUS and 46 States recognize that people can change their sex. You and Donald Trump don't. I get it, but you're wrong and terribly ignorant. There's a lot more involved in gender affirming treatment and surgery than merely "snipping privates"; maybe if you'd eve ...[text shortened]... you'd learn this.

I've answered the same question over and over and over again. I won't anymore.

You are the dumbest, socially correct at a certain time, follow the leader, brainwashed morons I have ever seen. So let’s say all this totally changes, not accepted by the liberal masses or anyone else, off the books, are they now a gay man with feminine traits. I’m just following your logic here and what controls your beliefs.

@mike69 said
You are the dumbest, socially correct at a certain time, follow the leader, brainwashed morons I have ever seen. So let’s say all this totally changes, not accepted by the liberal masses or anyone else, off the books, are they now a gay man with feminine traits. I’m just following your logic here and what controls your beliefs.

Just what do you think will change just because right wingers want to deny sex change procedures exist? People have been having them for about 70 years or so.

@no1marauder said
Just what do you think will change just because right wingers want to deny sex change procedures exist? People have been having them for about 70 years or so.

I care about what they doing to their bodies because of high suicide rates later on and other mental issues not addressed. It’s their bodies and no one is stopping them although a large portion of these people are young autistic men with issues looking for happiness, love, and acceptance in this new world of lies and deception. The rape numbers are four times higher than women due to high amounts of drugs and alcohol and being taken advantage of, some acceptance and love you support. Their are mental issues that need addressed rather than saying I support this because it’s popular and in style, go for it, like the people here, very sad. The issue I asked you and have issues with is the pushing of these things into society making them normal and forcing it on everyone that realizes the dangers and lies and the pushing of things like sports, locker rooms, restrooms and more. With age comes wisdom and the ability to see through fads and lies from seeing them come and go and you are pathetic at your age along with others here pushing these things. Now if all these things happened with no backing from liberal governments in any way, sports and all, would you think it was a gay man with feminine attributes and feel bad for them butchering their bodies and on or think they were now a real woman that if you were younger you would be with sexually trimmed or not?

@mike69 said
You are the dumbest, socially correct at a certain time, follow the leader, brainwashed morons I have ever seen. So let’s say all this totally changes, not accepted by the liberal masses or anyone else, off the books, are they now a gay man with feminine traits. I’m just following your logic here and what controls your beliefs.

@no1
Nice no answer.