1. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    23 Dec '13 19:382 edits
    That is, as outraged as they were in Spirituality about the duck guy's free speech being violated?

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/22/world/sacco-offensive-tweet/
  2. Donationrwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    Royal Oak, MI
    Joined
    09 Sep '01
    Moves
    27626
    23 Dec '13 19:51
    Originally posted by JS357
    That is, as outraged as they were in Spirituality about the duck guy's free speech being violated?

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/22/world/sacco-offensive-tweet/
    The difference is that Sacco expressed remorse for her comments, whereas The Duckman has stood by his.
  3. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    23 Dec '13 20:10
    Originally posted by rwingett
    The difference is that Sacco expressed remorse for her comments, whereas The Duckman has stood by his.
    I can see where a company might find such poor judgment in a Director of Communications inadvisable though.

    Personally I thought the comment was obviously a joke albeit in poor taste.
  4. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    23 Dec '13 20:13
    Originally posted by rwingett
    The difference is that Sacco expressed remorse for her comments, whereas The Duckman has stood by his.
    Why should you need to express remorse for doing nothing wrong?

    You political correctness folks really are a barrel of laughs.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree