23 Dec '13 19:38>2 edits
That is, as outraged as they were in Spirituality about the duck guy's free speech being violated?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/22/world/sacco-offensive-tweet/
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/22/world/sacco-offensive-tweet/
Originally posted by JS357The difference is that Sacco expressed remorse for her comments, whereas The Duckman has stood by his.
That is, as outraged as they were in Spirituality about the duck guy's free speech being violated?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/22/world/sacco-offensive-tweet/
Originally posted by rwingettI can see where a company might find such poor judgment in a Director of Communications inadvisable though.
The difference is that Sacco expressed remorse for her comments, whereas The Duckman has stood by his.