Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 23 Dec '13 19:38 / 2 edits
    That is, as outraged as they were in Spirituality about the duck guy's free speech being violated?

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/22/world/sacco-offensive-tweet/
  2. Donation rwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    23 Dec '13 19:51
    Originally posted by JS357
    That is, as outraged as they were in Spirituality about the duck guy's free speech being violated?

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/22/world/sacco-offensive-tweet/
    The difference is that Sacco expressed remorse for her comments, whereas The Duckman has stood by his.
  3. Subscriber no1marauder
    It's Nice to Be Nice
    23 Dec '13 20:10
    Originally posted by rwingett
    The difference is that Sacco expressed remorse for her comments, whereas The Duckman has stood by his.
    I can see where a company might find such poor judgment in a Director of Communications inadvisable though.

    Personally I thought the comment was obviously a joke albeit in poor taste.
  4. 23 Dec '13 20:13
    Originally posted by rwingett
    The difference is that Sacco expressed remorse for her comments, whereas The Duckman has stood by his.
    Why should you need to express remorse for doing nothing wrong?

    You political correctness folks really are a barrel of laughs.