@Earl-of-Trumps
Ah, so a mere 50 dead at the hands of an AK47 wielding shooter means nothing because governments can kill millions.
@sonhouse saidyou talking about chicago this past weekend?
@Earl-of-Trumps
Ah, so a mere 50 dead at the hands of an AK47 wielding shooter means nothing because governments can kill millions.
@dood111 saidYes. You do see the problem in this though, don’t you?
Here in Arizona we can carry a firearm openly or concealed without asking anyone's permission, no license is required. Likewise we can keep a gun in our car with no problem.
We are not about to give that up.
And it’s not the gun or the car.
@sonhouse saidI did not say "50 dead" means nothing.
@Earl-of-Trumps
Ah, so a mere 50 dead at the hands of an AK47 wielding shooter means nothing because governments can kill millions.
I will say that 2 million defenseless men women and children killed by the Khmer Rouge sucks a lot more.
You were alive when that happened. Whatsumatter, forget already?
@mott-the-hoople saidWhy do you cite an example of the problem whilst arguing that it’s not a problem?
you talking about chicago this past weekend?
@kevcvs57 saidblacks killing blacks...the means used is not the problem
Why do you cite an example of the problem whilst arguing that it’s not a problem?
@mott-the-hoople saidErr yes it is, the availability of firearms is exactly the problem.
blacks killing blacks...the means used is not the problem
People killing people is the issue why are you making the point about them being black?
Do you think as many people would get killed by sticks and stones if the guns were not a available?
1 edit
@kevcvs57 saidhistory proves yes, as many people would be killed. man has been killing man from the beginning of time.
Err yes it is, the availability of firearms is exactly the problem.
People killing people is the issue why are you making the point about them being black?
Do you think as many people would get killed by sticks and stones if the guns were not a available?
I mention blacks because they have a higher kill rate than any other race.
https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/what-are-the-real-stats-on-black
@mott-the-hoople saidNo it doesn’t, don’t be utterly ridiculous.
history proves yes, as many people would be killed. man has been killing man from the beginning of time.
I mention blacks because they have a higher kill rate than any other race.
https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/what-are-the-real-stats-on-black
@kevcvs57 saidIm sure you can point to a time when man wasnt killing each other. 🙄
No it doesn’t, don’t be utterly ridiculous.
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidNo but the development of automatic and magazine fed weapons was a game changer. Precisely because it’s in our nature to kill each other that we need to restrict our ability to kill each other. 🙄
Im sure you can point to a time when man wasnt killing each other. 🙄