1. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    05 Mar '15 01:49
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    Interesting clause. So the SCOTUS is unconstitutional?
    Only if it exercises legislative power.
  2. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    05 Mar '15 01:52
    Originally posted by JS357
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondelegation_doctrine

    "In the Federal Government of the United States, the nondelegation doctrine is the principle that the Congress of the United States, being vested with "all legislative powers" by Article One, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, cannot delegate that power to anyone else. However, the Supreme Court ...[text shortened]... utherland, Sanford, Stone

    Blame them, or whichever ones constituted the vote of the majority.
    Wonder why decisions of SCOTUS are viewed as sacrosanct. Anyone in his right mind can cite decisions of SCOTUS which were and are wrong. Start with Dredd Scott. Why is the court so reluctant to correct itself, or to craft decisions which are usually very narrow.
  3. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    05 Mar '15 03:24
    Originally posted by normbenign
    Wonder why decisions of SCOTUS are viewed as sacrosanct. Anyone in his right mind can cite decisions of SCOTUS which were and are wrong. Start with Dredd Scott. Why is the court so reluctant to correct itself, or to craft decisions which are usually very narrow.
    SCOTUS is nothing more than a rubber stamp for the powers that be.

    They care nothing about the Constitution.
  4. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    05 Mar '15 06:47
    Originally posted by normbenign
    Only if it exercises legislative power.
    It does. It is the most powerful legislative body in the US.
  5. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    05 Mar '15 22:531 edit
    Originally posted by normbenign
    Wonder why decisions of SCOTUS are viewed as sacrosanct. Anyone in his right mind can cite decisions of SCOTUS which were and are wrong. Start with Dredd Scott. Why is the court so reluctant to correct itself, or to craft decisions which are usually very narrow.
    Generally when someone quotes a decision of the SCOTUS the person responding is free to point out the supposed error of the reasoning given in said decision. "Dred Scott" or "Lochner" or whatever was wrong is not an answer; it is usually simply a dodge.
  6. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    05 Mar '15 22:54
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    It does. It is the most powerful legislative body in the US.
    In what sense? Surely you are using the term "legislative" in a non-standard manner.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree