Nibiru is exist, location opposite of our sun. Most of our telescope and observation cannot see other side of sun. Cannot say goldilock line containt only earth, we still don't know other side view of sun. And, we cannot jump only utarid until pluto those planet we know. Rotation planet with sun not necessary same magnitud like we learn in science book, there are 360 degree and much other rotation that we cannot telescope and see.
Originally posted by Coolerayahhttp://homestarrunner.com/sbemail43.html
Nibiru is exist, location opposite of our sun. Most of our telescope and observation cannot see other side of sun. Cannot say goldilock line containt only earth, we still don't know other side view of sun. And, we cannot jump only utarid until pluto those planet we know. Rotation planet with sun not necessary same magnitud like we learn in science book, there are 360 degree and much other rotation that we cannot telescope and see.
Originally posted by CoolerayahThat is not true. 🙄🙄
Nibiru is exist, location opposite of our sun. Most of our telescope and observation cannot see other side of sun. Cannot say goldilock line containt only earth, we still don't know other side view of sun. And, we cannot jump only utarid until pluto those planet we know. Rotation planet with sun not necessary same magnitud like we learn in science book, there are 360 degree and much other rotation that we cannot telescope and see.
Originally posted by CoolerayahHow do you know Nibiru exists?
Nibiru is exist, location opposite of our sun. Most of our telescope and observation cannot see other side of sun. Cannot say goldilock line containt only earth, we still don't know other side view of sun. And, we cannot jump only utarid until pluto those planet we know. Rotation planet with sun not necessary same magnitud like we learn in science book, there are 360 degree and much other rotation that we cannot telescope and see.
Originally posted by Great King RatNot really, because I can't be sure if the O.P. poster is someone who has trouble expressing himself in the English language or if he was just trying to be funny. What would be weird is if I didn't understand the underlying assumption in your answer and I thought you weren't trying to be funny.
Just someone with a wacky believe in something for which there is absolutely no proof. It’s just a matter of believing, apparently. Weird, isn’t it?
