In practise it would be impossible to "take out" the Fed - only the US government can do it. It's a large organization, and most people working for it can be replaced quickly. The Fed does not really depend on any concrete infrastructure that much. It's like the attack on the Pentagon - the way the MoD works was never really hampered even though a large part of the building was destroyed. I suppose you could somehow steal all the gold (maybe George Clooney could do it) but that would probably not change that much concerning the way the Fed works.
Originally posted by KazetNagorra
In practise it would be impossible to "take out" the Fed - only the US government can do it. It's a large organization, and most people working for it can be replaced quickly. The Fed does not really depend on any concrete infrastructure that much. It's like the attack on the Pentagon - the way the MoD works was never really hampered even though a large ...[text shortened]... could do it) but that would probably not change that much concerning the way the Fed works.
I suppose you could somehow steal all the gold-KazetNagorra
What are you talking about KN ? What gold ?!
Originally posted by KazetNagorraIt is an obvious terrorist target. Remember 9/11? They tried the same thing years before and it failed the first time. This tells me that they may continue to target it until they are successful. Therefore, asking what benefit in terms of harming the country it will produce is a logical question I think. If it will cause systemic harm, perhaps they should think about decentralizing the Fed so that not all of their eggs are in one basket so to speak.
What's "it"? An attack? Well, nothing, since the attack would be futile with respect to seriously hindering the operations of the Fed. What do you think would happen?
Originally posted by whodeyYou mentioned 911. If you really understand what happened there then I ask you what caused bldg 7 to collapse?
It is an obvious terrorist target. Remember 9/11? They tried the same thing years before and it failed the first time. This tells me that they may continue to target it until they are successful. Therefore, asking what benefit in terms of harming the country it will produce is a logical question I think. If it will cause systemic harm, perhaps they shoul ...[text shortened]... think about decentralizing the Fed so that not all of their eggs are in one basket so to speak.
Originally posted by joe beyserIt was an obvious conspiracy, clearly there were many secret documents stashed in building 7. Otherwise, why would the government collapse the building long after it was already evacuated...?
You mentioned 911. If you really understand what happened there then I ask you what caused bldg 7 to collapse?
Originally posted by KazetNagorraYou mean like a giant shredder?
It was an obvious conspiracy, clearly there were many secret documents stashed in building 7. Otherwise, why would the government collapse the building long after it was already evacuated...?
Too bad Enron did not think about doing this. 😛