Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 26 Nov '16 09:45
    Just probably a coincidence right?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/australia-joins-norway-it-cuts-clinton-foundation-donations-0
  2. 26 Nov '16 09:59
    Wow, that's surprising. Governments don't want to appear politically motivated in determining charitable donations.

    Could Hillary be more crooked!
  3. 26 Nov '16 12:12
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    Wow, that's surprising. Governments don't want to appear politically motivated in determining charitable donations.

    Could Hillary be more crooked!
    I found the Australian governments reason to be incomprehensible. Infact its was empty rhetoric and explained nothing,
  4. 26 Nov '16 13:15
    Enquirer - Why are you cutting funding.
    Australian government - The Clinton Foundation has a proven track record of helping developing countries?

    Really? Did I read that correctly? Does it even provide a reason? Why does it make NO SENSE?

    lets read it again.

    When asked why donations were being cut off now, a Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade official simply said that the Clinton Foundation has “a proven track record” in helping developing countries.

    Does anyone else feel that it simply does not follow, a non sequitur of Ralph Wiggam proportions!
  5. Subscriber mchill
    cryptogram
    26 Nov '16 18:35
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    Enquirer - Why are you cutting funding.
    Australian government - The Clinton Foundation has a proven track record of helping developing countries?

    Really? Did I read that correctly? Does it even provide a reason? Why does it make NO SENSE?

    lets read it again.

    When asked why donations were being cut off now, a Department of Foreign Affairs a ...[text shortened]... oes anyone else feel that it simply does not follow, a non sequitur of Ralph Wiggam proportions!
    Maybe the Aussies are practicing double speak skills for their next election.
  6. 26 Nov '16 18:57
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    I found the Australian governments reason to be incomprehensible. Infact its was empty rhetoric and explained nothing,
    Maybe its because you read the answer to a different question. Not surprising you are confused about the answer.
  7. 26 Nov '16 18:57
    Originally posted by mchill
    Maybe the Aussies are practicing double speak skills for their next election.
    Or maybe its Robbie and the reporters fault, and nothing to do with the Aussies.
  8. Standard member checkbaiter
    By God's Grace
    26 Nov '16 19:53
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    Just probably a coincidence right?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/australia-joins-norway-it-cuts-clinton-foundation-donations-0
    No comment due to political profiling.
  9. Standard member HandyAndy
    Non sum qualis eram
    26 Nov '16 20:12
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    Just probably a coincidence right?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/australia-joins-norway-it-cuts-clinton-foundation-donations-0
    Another scoop for zeroboy.
  10. 26 Nov '16 23:16 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by HandyAndy
    Another scoop for zeroboy.
    you still weepin snowflake, chin up maybe there will be a recount and we can mock you again!
  11. Standard member HandyAndy
    Non sum qualis eram
    26 Nov '16 23:28
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    you still weepin snowflake, chin up maybe there will be a recount and we can mock you again!
    Looking forward to it! In the meantime, go mock yourself.
  12. 26 Nov '16 23:32
    Originally posted by HandyAndy
    Looking forward to it! In the meantime, go mock yourself.
    I thought Hillary told Trump to accept the results. Now she is unwilling to accept the results? Say it isn't so.
  13. 27 Nov '16 13:03 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    Just probably a coincidence right?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/australia-joins-norway-it-cuts-clinton-foundation-donations-0
    Sorry, I can't accept the validity of this news source.

    None of these people seem to be on the payroll of Soros.

    If the news source were valid, the Huffington Post and CNN would be all over it!

    More right wing lies. Nothing to see here.
  14. 27 Nov '16 13:35
    For the record, I think that Australia is making a big mistake here.

    They should have waited for the Jill Stein recount first.

    Mwahahahaha!!
  15. 27 Nov '16 14:23
    Originally posted by whodey
    Sorry, I can't accept the validity of this news source.

    None of these people seem to be on the payroll of Soros.

    If the news source were valid, the Huffington Post and CNN would be all over it!

    More right wing lies. Nothing to see here.
    Indeed when I pressed Randy Andy on the validity of CNN he told me that it was valid because it was trusted by millions, an argument ad populum, many people believe it therefore it is, a nonsense and logically fallacious argument. Infact zerohedge produced a list of the utterly corrupt mainstream media who had supported Mrs Clinton and who did her bidding, outed by wikileaks email dumps. I don't know anyone who takes CNN seriously as a reputable news source except for Hillary Zombies like Randy Andy who is still in denial.