Originally posted by KazetNagorraI found the Australian governments reason to be incomprehensible. Infact its was empty rhetoric and explained nothing,
Wow, that's surprising. Governments don't want to appear politically motivated in determining charitable donations.
Could Hillary be more crooked!
Originally posted by robbie carrobieMaybe the Aussies are practicing double speak skills for their next election.
Enquirer - Why are you cutting funding.
Australian government - The Clinton Foundation has a proven track record of helping developing countries?
Really? Did I read that correctly? Does it even provide a reason? Why does it make NO SENSE?
lets read it again.
When asked why donations were being cut off now, a Department of Foreign Affairs a ...[text shortened]... oes anyone else feel that it simply does not follow, a non sequitur of Ralph Wiggam proportions!
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSorry, I can't accept the validity of this news source.
Just probably a coincidence right?
Originally posted by whodeyIndeed when I pressed Randy Andy on the validity of CNN he told me that it was valid because it was trusted by millions, an argument ad populum, many people believe it therefore it is, a nonsense and logically fallacious argument. Infact zerohedge produced a list of the utterly corrupt mainstream media who had supported Mrs Clinton and who did her bidding, outed by wikileaks email dumps. I don't know anyone who takes CNN seriously as a reputable news source except for Hillary Zombies like Randy Andy who is still in denial.
Sorry, I can't accept the validity of this news source.
None of these people seem to be on the payroll of Soros.
If the news source were valid, the Huffington Post and CNN would be all over it!
More right wing lies. Nothing to see here.