http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cole_inquiry
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,18807067-29277,00.html
"When you get to a stage where a government of Australia has as its single greatest defence on a grave question of national security its incompetence and its negligence, you've got to wonder how far down the drain we've gone," Mr Rudd (the political opposition) said
Originally posted by flexmoreor that our prime minister is willing to be quetioned on the matter in front of a commission that he created and whose scope and terms of reference he proscibed. Let the freedom bell ring out over the hills and valleys........
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cole_inquiry
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,18807067-29277,00.html
"When you get to a stage where a government of Australia has as its single greatest defence on a grave question of national security its incompetence and its negligence, you've got to wonder how far down the drain we've gone," Mr Rudd (the political opposition) said
Living in Australia my self we've been bombarded with media coverage on the issue. From what I understand the government has NOT been implicated in any negligence or criminal collusion with the AWB (Australian Wheat Board which payed the kickbacks to Iraq in the food-for-oil scheme).
However, there certainly is alot of prevarication from senior ministers.
First our PM says, "I was never told [of the wheat scandal]; I never knew", then "I cannot remember being told" and then "I was lied to; betrayed; deceived by the AWB".
EDIT: Oh, and Mr. Rudd has greatly exaggerated the issue and I suspect even compromised our exports in his expediency. I would not quote him as credible.
Originally posted by Conrau Kif you google "total value of iraq australia wheat trade" you get some interesting australian bureau of statistics info that tell you amongst other things that the total value of trade is not known as they are subject to confidentiality agreements, but in 2001 we did 750mils worth of business in total with them.
From what I understand the government has NOT been implicated in any negligence or criminal collusion with the AWB (Australian Wheat Board which payed the kickbacks to Iraq in the food-for-oil scheme).
...However, there certainly is a lot of prevarication........
In 2003-04 our total wheat exports realised 3.4bil and our wheat trade with iraq represented roughly 10% of our total wheat exports for that year.
Either way the AWB has only been a listed company since about 2000 . Previously it had been a governmentally run and regulated board. For government to suggest that 300 mil in kickbacks could somehow go unnoticed and that senior pollies knew nothing about it is as alice in wonderland a moment as bill clinton quibbling over the meaning of "is"
Originally posted by kmax87Still, the AWB amounts to 1%* of our exports. You can hardly notice 10% of that 1% disappearing (although they eventually did). The problem is not about their belated discovery of the kickbacks but their apathetic response (of which the negligence has not be determined- and I do not know if it is in the scope of the Cole- Commission to judge if it was).
if you google "total value of iraq australia wheat trade" you get some interesting australian bureau of statistics info that tell you amongst other things that the total value of trade is not known as they are subject to confidentiality agreements, but in 2001 we did 750mils worth of business in total with them.
In 2003-04 our total wheat exports realised ...[text shortened]... out it is as alice in wonderland a moment as bill clinton quibbling over the meaning of "is"
*These figues disagree with yours. I dont know why.
Originally posted by Conrau KI'm not sure of your 1%. The ABS links that deal with wheat trade show Australia responsible for roughly 15% of world wheat export market.
Still, the AWB amounts to 1%* of our exports. You can hardly notice 10% of that 1% disappearing (although they eventually did). The problem is not about their belated discovery of the kickbacks but their apathetic response (of which the negligence has not be determined- and I do not know if it is in the scope of the Cole- Commission to judge if it was).
*These figues disagree with yours. I dont know why.
(ABS YEAR Book Australia,2006. Link at bottom of post)
Note that there are two important 15% statistics on this page.
"The gross value of production of wheat in 2003-04 was $5.6 billion (b) which represented 15% of the total value of farm production. With overseas sales in 2003-04 of over $3.4b, wheat is one of Australia's most valuable exports, making it a significant player in the world wheat market."
And the other " While Australia produces only about 3% of the world's wheat output, it exports to more than 40 countries. Australia's total wheat exports represent around 15% of the world wheat trade annually"
For 03-04 it would seem our wheat crop as exports amounted to AU$3.4bil for which we exported 14,5mil tonne of which 1,1mil tonne went to iraq. (For 04-05 we exported 15mil tonne in total of which 1,5 mil tonne went to Iraq- no dollar figure is given for this period)
Unless I've got it all wrong that would be roughly 10% of our export trade has gone to Iraq for the past few years and for 03-04 at least that would amount to AU$340million. Now I dont know what period the kick-backs go over but thats a disproportional amount of bribery for the volume being traded
sorry about the link I tried to shorten it of its googleism but it doesnt work when i do...you will have to copy all five lines of it..
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache: Z wU5XQ4bnjkJ:www.abs.gov.au/
Ausstats/abs%40.nsf/Latestproducts/1301.0Feature%2520Article212006%
3Fopendocument%26tabname%3DSummary%26prodno%3D1301.0%
26issue%3D2006%26num%3D%26view%
3D+total+value+of+iraq+australia+wheat+trade&hl=en&gl=au&ct=clnk&cd=3
Originally posted by kmax87This all seems correct. I was relying on a newspaper article- so your probably right. (thanks for the effort with the site).
I'm not sure of your 1%. The ABS links that deal with wheat trade show Australia responsible for roughly 15% of world wheat export market.
(ABS YEAR Book Australia,2006. Link at bottom of post)
Note that there are two important 15% statistics on this page.
"The gross value of production of wheat in 2003-04 was $5.6 billion (b) which represented 15 ...[text shortened]... 26num%3D%26view%
3D+total+value+of+iraq+australia+wheat+trade&hl=en&gl=au&ct=clnk&cd=3
Anyway, it was noticed that there was a discrepancy in the wheat sales. The foriegn affairs department cabled a report on it expressing concern and no one responded. The Foreign affairs department then abandoned any detailed investigation. I'm not sure if this is criminal or not.
Originally posted by Conrau KIt seems each succeeding year the bar gets raised a bit higher in terms of corruption of the highest order that the general public are meant to swallow as being just another inadvertant bureaucratic oversight..(move along, move along, nothing to see) to the extent that one wonders that either our leaders are nothing more than glorified PR people that get told nothing in order to protect the trails of corruption because the alternative just leaves me gobsmacked.
This all seems correct. I was relying on a newspaper article- so your probably right. (thanks for the effort with the site).
Anyway, it was noticed that there was a discrepancy in the wheat sales. The foriegn affairs department cabled a report on it expressing concern and no one responded. The Foreign affairs department then abandoned any detailed investigation. I'm not sure if this is criminal or not.
That the corruption reaches into every high office and that the chance of any wrongdoing or doer being caught is roughly 3/4's of 4/5's of 5/8's of SFA.
Originally posted by kmax87Dont jump the gun. Yeah for sure they've been corrupt in the past (i.e. Tampa crisis, refugees... did you hear about the girl locked up in a refugee camp or the man you killed himself) but I dont know if they were criminally responsible. Just wait and see.
It seems each succeeding year the bar gets raised a bit higher in terms of corruption of the highest order that the general public are meant to swallow as being just another inadvertant bureaucratic oversight..(move along, move along, nothing to see) to the extent that one wonders that either our leaders are nothing more than glorified PR people that get told ...[text shortened]... the chance of any wrongdoing or doer being caught is roughly 3/4's of 4/5's of 5/8's of SFA.
Originally posted by Conrau KI hardly know what qualifies as criminally responsible anymore. Seriously.
Dont jump the gun. Yeah for sure they've been corrupt in the past (i.e. Tampa crisis, refugees... did you hear about the girl locked up in a refugee camp or the man you killed himself) but I dont know if they were criminally responsible. Just wait and see.
In a significant way you would probably say that the AWB was between a rock and a hard place doing business with Iraq. It would be reasonable to suggest that business was always carried on with Saddam's regime in a similar form. If that was the case then one wonders why this has become a story.
I just dont buy the ignorance defence or this was a job for the advisors and for the staffers. What do the pollies do for their 8-10 hrs a day that his sort of corruption can go unnoticed for years. Its like Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling doing a charm act and saying, trust us, we knew nothing about warehousing debt as assets, honest, trust us, do these faces lie??
Originally posted by kmax87...headed by a chum he went to legal school with.
or that our prime minister is willing to be quetioned on the matter in front of a commission that he created and whose scope and terms of reference he proscibed. Let the freedom bell ring out over the hills and valleys........
Originally posted by kmax87i think that pollies are only interested in finding things they can use for their political advancement.
...
I just dont buy the ignorance defence or this was a job for the advisors and for the staffers. What do the pollies do for their 8-10 hrs a day that his sort of corruption can go unnoticed for years. Its like Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling doing a charm act and saying, trust us, we knew nothing about warehousing debt as assets, honest, trust us, do these faces lie??
there was no political advancement to be gained by getting the information out there.
it was not connected to anyone personally in a politically relevant way, so noone had to react defensively ... to aggressively out the info yourself would leave the mud sticking to you and you would look like a dobber on your mates, and bring condemnation from fellow ministers left looking stupid ... so they all just ignored it.
lets go to war with iraq - and make some money helping their weapons supply at the same time!
Hey boys, I met quite a few "diggers" in Nam and have kept in contact with a few over the years. I feel you learn a lot about what happens in a country, not by what you read in newspapers - they are constrained politically and economically, they basically need to appease the populace so that they sell and their advertisers stick with them ...etc etc- but by talking to the people who come from that country.
Your country of Australia is full of liars and crooks. Thats not saying ours is any better.
But get real, most politicians/chief execs etc have had a lifetime of bullshit training. They'll squirm there way out of this one, the sooner the Iranian war starts the better for them, it'll deflect the iterest off them and with 330million (plus!) in kick backs, there are alot of people who will get kick-backs themselves for shutting up and a lot of lawyers who will be stopping justice being done in your courts.
Your country has a terrible history of coverups, look at the Aborigine hunts that your farmers used to have, to cler their land.
Look at your seriously crooked NSW police force.
What about the criminal hencemen that ruled Queensland from 70s to 80s.
Your country is a breeding ground for liars and cheats. The crooks are probably cleaner than your politicians and police force!