Originally posted by Wajoma
I am a little surprised you'd keep this one alive Cliff, sometimes it's better to help threads fade away as quickly as possible by staying away from them, you know, try to save some face.
I said: "...ill researched hack job." in reference to the article you posted, the link you posted, natually enough eh. I did read the article and it was not written by lly published.
A kudos to no1 for starting this thread, thumbs up, no1.
Well, well, look who is falling into rant mode...
But Ford didn't come up with Evva Pryror, McConnell did. So anything said by her should be attributed to him.
More from Pryror:
Evva Joan Pryor, who had been a social worker in New York in the 1970s, was interviewed in 1998 by Scott McConnell, who was then the director of communications for the Ayn Rand Institute.
“She was coming to a point in her life where she was going to receive
the very thing she didn’t like, which was Medicare and Social
Security,” Pryor told McConnell. “I remember telling her that this was
going to be difficult. For me to do my job she had to recognize that
there were exceptions to her theory. So that started our political
discussions. From there on – with gusto – we argued all the time.
The initial argument was on greed,” Pryor continued. “She had to see
that there was such a thing as greed in this world. Doctors could cost
an awful lot more money than books earn, and she could be totally wiped
out by medical bills if she didn’t watch it. Since she had worked her
entire life, and had paid into Social Security, she had a right to it.
She didn’t feel that an individual should take help.”
Patia Stephens wrote of Rand:
Rand is one of three women the Cato Institute calls founders of
American libertarianism. The other two, Rose Wilder Lane and Isabel
“Pat” Paterson, both rejected Social Security benefits on principle.
Lane, with whom Rand corresponded for several years, once quit an
editorial job in order to avoid paying Social Security taxes. The Cato
Institute says Lane considered Social Security a “Ponzi fraud” and “told
friends that it would be immoral of her to take part in a system that
would predictably collapse so catastrophically.” Lane died in 1968.
So, it is pretty obvious, that while you believe that it was okay for Rand to take the government money since she had paid into it, she did not. I think that it is awesome that you have greater insight into what she believed than someone who knew her and spoke directly to her about these issues. Or maybe it is that you are blinded to the truth by the myth that you have wrapped her in. She was human. She struggled with the hypocrisy of her decision, but in the end she caved. She would not have been one of the heroes of her own books. She would have been an example of weak will and character.