The post that was quoted here has been removedMen do not typically wear make-up, visit nail bars for acrylic nail treatment, visit beauticians etc etc This therefore begs the question why are you holding men and women to the same standards when clearly women spend a lot more time and energy on cosmetics, dress and physical appearance. Is it really because expectations are higher for women or that they simply create higher expectations by their behaviour?
10 Apr 17
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWould you feel comfortable if your wife was required to wear heels and miniskirts at work?
Men do not typically wear make-up, visit nail bars for acrylic nail treatment, visit beauticians etc etc This therefore begs the question why are you holding men and women to the same standards when clearly women spend a lot more time and energy on cosmetics, dress and physical appearance. Is it really because expectations are higher for women or that they simply create higher expectations by their behaviour?
10 Apr 17
Originally posted by robbie carrobieif that's their choice, fine.
Men do not typically wear make-up, visit nail bars for acrylic nail treatment, visit beauticians etc etc This therefore begs the question why are you holding men and women to the same standards when clearly women spend a lot more time and energy on cosmetics, dress and physical appearance. Is it really because expectations are higher for women or that they simply create higher expectations by their behaviour?
it is clearly wrong to force them to do so.
10 Apr 17
Originally posted by sh76what you fail to understand is that they are banning the requirement to wear high heels. nobody is stopping anyone from wearing them if they so choose. there is a difference. big one
High heels should be banned as torture devices... certainly before burkinis.
10 Apr 17
Originally posted by ZahlanziDilbert you dilbert, of course employers can stop you from wearing high heels at work, many do. You may be better keeping that activity in the privacy of your home anyway.
what you fail to understand is that they are banning the requirement to wear high heels. nobody is stopping anyone from wearing them if they so choose. there is a difference. big one
10 Apr 17
The post that was quoted here has been removedDoes any male prime minister have to be concerned about a newspaper judging his legs' appearance?
Perhaps not his legs but Mr. Corbyn was repeatedly chastised for his alleged slovenly appearance. Its clear that Mrs May needs a fashion guru like me because some of her creations have been in very poor taste especially her trip to America. That orange jacket was hideous.
14 Apr 17
Originally posted by EladarMe too, I thought this was a clickbait play on words where somehow Dark Lord Bannon's Whitehouse was revelling in the joy of seeing accentuated female calf muscles.
The title of the thread had me confused? I thought D started this to complain about the city of Banning.