1. silicon valley
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    101289
    17 Jun '10 21:24
    http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/06/17/scotus.property/

    Beachfront homeowners lose at Supreme Court

    By the CNN Wire Staff
    June 17, 2010 2:59 p.m. EDT
    The Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a case pitting homeowners against Florida conservation officials.

    Washington (CNN) -- Owners of private waterfront property don't have title to beachfront land restored by the state, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a case that pitted resort-town homeowners against Florida conservation officials.

    In an 8-0 ruling with several concurring opinions, the justices found no constitutional violation occurred when Florida claimed public ownership of beaches created by depositing tons of new sand on eroding shorelines. Homeowners along that beachfront argued that they were deprived of traditional shoreline rights in what amounted to a "judicial taking" of property.

    ....
  2. silicon valley
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    101289
    17 Jun '10 21:24
    ouch
  3. Joined
    08 Oct '08
    Moves
    5542
    17 Jun '10 21:50
    Originally posted by zeeblebot
    http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/06/17/scotus.property/

    Beachfront homeowners lose at Supreme Court

    By the CNN Wire Staff
    June 17, 2010 2:59 p.m. EDT
    The Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a case pitting homeowners against Florida conservation officials.

    Washington (CNN) -- Owners of private waterfront property don't have title to beachfront land rest ...[text shortened]... of traditional shoreline rights in what amounted to a "judicial taking" of property.

    ....
    So I can expect that those homeowners will take full responsibility for cleaning up any oil that washes up onto "their" beaches?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree