@Duchess64
I guess the fact that it is an ongoing project where they will look at such failures and modify the code to make it more equitable.
So come back in 2 years and maybe that bias will be gone.
@Duchess64
You know, that reminds me. We had the Ms Universe contest this year and guess what, someone from Earth won AGAIN!
@Duchess64
Jeez, you never heard of Tatooine? Anyway, with a hundred billion or more stars in our galaxy alone and probably at least one planet per star, so hundreds of billions of planets, and probably a WHOLE lot more just in our galaxy and of course there are hundreds of billions of galaxies.
Going by the idea that physics and chemistry is going to come out the same anywhere in our universe, it would seem statistically impossible for there NOT to be life elsewhere, even if it is a million light years away.
My theory is we have not seen aliens because perhaps the universe only allows one advanced civilization (big assumption calling our civilization 'advanced', quite a stretch) per galaxy and even at that, there would be literally hundreds of billions of such civilizations in the visible universe and probably trillions in the part of the universe permanently hidden because of the expansion and accelerated expansion of the universe going on for a few billion years, which means such civilizations will forever be out of our reach and more would disappear every year till only our galaxy is visible and any new civilization coming up in our galaxy, say 100 billion years from now, they would not know there was any kind of extended universe because to them the galaxy would be THE universe. Anyway, I think it highly unlikely there would NOT be females in even our own galaxy.
The post that was quoted here has been removedI find this rather amusing, most people have their own biases. Some prefer redheads, some blonds. some prefer white, some not, so what. The spectrum is vast. AI can not be true AI if you must tell it what to think. That is what the modern left does.
It is rather sad that we look at the results and say, oh they must be wrong because " WE " do not agree. Boy, that is the way we are going and it is all so wrong.
Two of my grandchildren and 3 nephews are of varying " colour ". Me, personally, feel that " looks " the best, but thats just me. That is no reflection on dark or pasty white people, or any other colour.
What they will do is " teach " the AI that it must be wrong.
It is all getting rather pathetic.
@Duchess64
very true, they might flap fins together for all we know but out of the literally trillions of stars in hundreds of billions of galaxies I would be totally surprised if there were no sexual reproduction elsewhere in the universe.
What we can SEE is about 14 billion ly away and no more because of the expansion of the universe but it seems there is more to our universe than what we can see because it might be something like 50 billion ly across if we could tape measure the universe🙂
I would love to know if for instance we find life on Mars, does it have our style DNA, suggesting a parallel evolution and then if we ever find life on say Europa or other outer moons would we find the same DNA as Earthy life? If answered in the affirmative, it might be evidence that life was seeded by an organic slurry mix of a nebula cloud we know hit the solar system, of course 'hit' is a bit overdoing it but that could explain if life elsewhere come from a common cause.
If not, say the life we find here in the solar system has a different backbone, not a spiral ladder but say a triangle like a radio tower with connections across those spines and such or maybe a quad, square four spine tower with cross connections. Of course there is probably a million ways to encode life information if we only could sample some of that other life we can only imagine today.
The post that was quoted here has been removedOn a more serious note.
They should copy the AI program and run multiple beauty contests on the same group of participants.
Does it reach the same result everytime?
If so, there is no intelligence. It’s just running through checklists.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I find Christina Ricci, for example, one of the most beautiful women, alongside Drew Barrymore.
Not many people agree with me.
Getting a computer program to decide what’s gorgeous can never work. For the simple reason that if they based beauty on my average input Danielle Brooks would never be picked. And she’s right up there with Drew, Christina and Bridgette Bardot in my books.
Another point may be found in photography.
Dark black skin on photos generally shows fewer subtleties. Hence that many photographers decrease darkness to make the photo come alive or use special techniques (backgrounds, lighting, etc.)
If the AI doesn’t take this into account, and the people sending in their photos don’t know about this, then fewer dark-skinned hits will surface.