- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
3 edits
@athousandyoung saidYou know that the Pentagon is not called Ground Zero which is in NYC right?
You know the Pentagon was hit on 9/11 right?
He wasn't at the Pentagon either.
Just lying as usual to make himself out to be some kind of hero.
@athousandyoung saidI also know the pentagon is in Virginia 😉
You know the Pentagon was hit on 9/11 right?
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@Mott-The-Hoople
Haha, yes, I was going to point that out too, but it is only a few miles from DC so I let it pass.
It was still dooshy to try to say he was at the Pentagon instead of NYC where he claimed to be, as if that was an excuse for his lying about it..
@athousandyoung saidThis child-like comment….. why did you end it with the word Right? That is what Suzanne does.
You know the Pentagon was hit on 9/11 right?
It is confusing to the average listener like myself, first you tell him that we were hit at the Pentagon. And then secondly, I think you are asking him if you are right, so you are telling him one thing and asking him if your tell is right?? I think? in the same sentence, which is quite superfluous.
A normal debater would say do you realize that the Pentagon was hit on 9/11.? then the listener only has to answer to one comment. Instead of two.
Look at it this way. What if the statement is incorrect? Does that mean he has to answer ‘wrong’ and then explain what he means when he says wrong?
Whew. AvJoes way is better.
@jj-adams saidHe was at Ground Zero nine days after the attack.https://nypost.com/2023/09/11/biden-claims-he-was-at-ground-zero-day-after-9-11-but-his-own-book-puts-him-in-dc/
Records show he was in Washington DC that day.
Shameless pathological liar.
So is he "lying"? A lie is "a false statement made with the intent to deceive".
Far more likely is he just didn't remember correctly.
@no1marauder saidWell, that settles that. And if you forget about his 40 years of lying, he is not a liar, never lied, and has never intended to deceive.
He was at Ground Zero nine days after the attack.https://nypost.com/2023/09/11/biden-claims-he-was-at-ground-zero-day-after-9-11-but-his-own-book-puts-him-in-dc/
So is he "lying"? A lie is "a false statement made with the intent to deceive".
Far more likely is he just didn't remember correctly.
Really, you guys are indeed slipping.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidLMFAO @marerider you idiot!
He was at Ground Zero nine days after the attack.https://nypost.com/2023/09/11/biden-claims-he-was-at-ground-zero-day-after-9-11-but-his-own-book-puts-him-in-dc/
So is he "lying"? A lie is "a false statement made with the intent to deceive".
Far more likely is he just didn't remember correctly.
"So is he "lying"? A lie is "a false statement made with the intent to deceive". '
you nailed it!
@mott-the-hoople saidHis statement could easily be checked, so it's unlikely he "intended to deceive". That would require he knew the statement was false but said it anyway even though he had to be aware his "lie" would be discovered with little difficulty.
LMFAO @marerider you idiot!
"So is he "lying"? A lie is "a false statement made with the intent to deceive". '
you nailed it!
The hate that pours from right wingers makes them unable to make rational assessments.