1. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    01 Nov '12 22:481 edit
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/01/michael-bloomberg-obama_n_2059212.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

    New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg endorsed President Barack Obama for reelection on Thursday, Bloomberg TV reported and The Huffington Post confirmed.

    The mayor, an Independent, did not endorse a candidate in the 2008 election and hadn't seem poised to do so this time around either. But he said in an op ed published on his website that his eagerness to see action on climate change legislation persuaded him to back a second term for the president.
  2. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2700
    02 Nov '12 06:44
    Climate change issues have been neglected throughout much of the campaign season. Nice to see it entering the narrative before the finish line.
  3. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    02 Nov '12 10:04
    Originally posted by Soothfast
    Climate change issues have been neglected throughout much of the campaign season.
    This is presumably because neither candidate is likely to do anything positive (because big business is against it) and neither would like to highlight this.
    In general the US is against doing anything about climate change and is embarrassed about their very selfish stance.
  4. Hy-Brasil
    Joined
    24 Feb '09
    Moves
    175970
    02 Nov '12 10:12
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    This is presumably because neither candidate is likely to do anything positive (because big business is against it) and neither would like to highlight this.
    In general the US is against doing anything about climate change and is embarrassed about their very selfish stance.
    What do you suggest the U.S. do about climate change ?
  5. Joined
    14 Dec '07
    Moves
    3763
    02 Nov '12 10:17
    Originally posted by utherpendragon
    What do you suggest the U.S. do about climate change ?
    Bomb china's coal plants.
  6. Hy-Brasil
    Joined
    24 Feb '09
    Moves
    175970
    02 Nov '12 10:27
    Originally posted by dryhump
    Bomb china's coal plants.
    I'm serious. Twhitehead says that the U.S. is "embarrassed about their very selfish stance."
    What does he and likeminded individuals think the U.S. should do that would be less selfish considering climate change ?
  7. Houston, Texas
    Joined
    28 Sep '10
    Moves
    14347
    02 Nov '12 11:46
    A well-reasoned endorsement. Bloomberg is a valued public servant and leader.
  8. Joined
    13 Mar '07
    Moves
    48661
    03 Nov '12 07:48
    Originally posted by utherpendragon
    I'm serious. Twhitehead says that the U.S. is "embarrassed about their very selfish stance."
    What does he and likeminded individuals think the U.S. should do that would be less selfish considering climate change ?
    Cut energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions?
  9. Hy-Brasil
    Joined
    24 Feb '09
    Moves
    175970
    03 Nov '12 07:55
    Originally posted by Teinosuke
    Cut energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions?
    Well thanks for answering the question Teinosuke.
    What I am unclear about is how is this supposed to happen ? Through taxation, fines ?
  10. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2700
    03 Nov '12 08:20
    Originally posted by utherpendragon
    Well thanks for answering the question Teinosuke.
    What I am unclear about is how is this supposed to happen ? Through taxation, fines ?
    How about common sense and good old-fashioned self-interest?
  11. Hy-Brasil
    Joined
    24 Feb '09
    Moves
    175970
    03 Nov '12 08:30
    Originally posted by Soothfast
    How about common sense and good old-fashioned self-interest?
    So then it would be on the honor system then ?
    We should drive less, turn off the lights when we leave the room, put air in our tires,etc.
    Corporations who produce green house gasses should take it upon themselves to do it less. I guess this is what you are saying.
    What of the individuals who do not adhere to these principals of "common sense" ?
  12. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2700
    03 Nov '12 08:38
    Originally posted by utherpendragon

    What of the individuals who do not adhere to these principals of "common sense" ?
    Fines, obviously.

    What I'm trying to say, though, is that the things that society has to do to counteract climate change are also just good things to do from an economic standpoint: using energy more efficiently, reducing industrial pollutants deleterious to human health, making the environment cleaner. Even if you don't believe in anthropogenic climate change (though you should), that doesn't negate the advantages of instituting common-sense reforms for a more prosperous and sustainable future.
  13. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    03 Nov '12 08:42
    Originally posted by utherpendragon
    Well thanks for answering the question Teinosuke.
    What I am unclear about is how is this supposed to happen ? Through taxation, fines ?
    In general the most efficient way is to tax energy consumption and let the market figure out the optimal way to reduce it.
  14. Hy-Brasil
    Joined
    24 Feb '09
    Moves
    175970
    03 Nov '12 09:47
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    In general the most efficient way is to tax energy consumption and let the market figure out the optimal way to reduce it.
    Behavorial change through taxation.
    The state of NY is doing that w/tobacco products.
    Following that logic the government could/should heap large taxes on peoples electric,natural gas,coal and oil usage.
    Large taxes on gasoline,cars over a certain size and wieght, more toll roads and bridges,etc,etc. Just tax them to the point where they think twice about using any of these products.
    Is that the the common sense reform we are getting at here ?
    Where do you see these new tax dollars going ?
    I've heard talk on off over the years coming from the left that American tax dollars should go to 3rd world countries for a kind of pennance,if you will, over our irresponsible over consuption of energy.
    Are you on board with that ?
  15. Joined
    06 Aug '07
    Moves
    8299
    03 Nov '12 11:50
    "I've heard talk on off over the years coming from the left that American tax dollars should go to 3rd world countries for a kind of pennance,if you will, over our irresponsible over consuption of energy. "

    That must have come from the loony left. They are just as ridiculous as the loony right. The obvious answer is that we keep the money in our own nation - for our own purposes.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree