@AverageJoe1 saidTrump is going to have to declare Marshall law. These dem mayors and governors will not uphold the laws.
$50,000 bounty on heads of ICE in Chicago. The 1966 law says the president can deploy all troops he wants to, to Chicago. Don't you libs just hate it. Do y'all know the illegal who drove his truck into ICE agents. I never recognize any of them, yet they are my brothers.
2 edits
@Mott-The-Hoople saidHe has power to do so. Many of our posters will be writing from park benches, as they take breaks from marching and waving signs that no one reads, signs which change no minds.
Trump is going to have to declare Marshall law. These dem mayors and governors will not uphold the laws.
If one of them gets hurt, and writes about it, I will get to use my line , you asked for it.
PS: I hope Trump turns IDF loose in Hamas, cleans the rats out. And IDF won’t be carrying signs!
@AverageJoe1 saidThere is no such law.
$50,000 bounty on heads of ICE in Chicago. The 1966 law says the president can deploy all troops he wants to, to Chicago. Don't you libs just hate it. Do y'all know the illegal who drove his truck into ICE agents. I never recognize any of them, yet they are my brothers.
Will you guys be satisfied with anything less than a fascist dictatorship?
@AverageJoe1 saidProtesters waving signs are "asking" to be hurt by troops?
He has power to do so. Many of our posters will be writing from park benches, as they take breaks from marching and waving signs that no one reads, signs which change no minds.
If one of them gets hurt, and writes about it, I will get to use my line , you asked for it.
PS: I hope Trump turns IDF loose in Hamas, cleans the rats out. And IDF won’t be carrying signs!
You really are going off the deep end. I suggest you reread the First Amendment.
@no1marauder saidYes, as they are taking/assuming a risk, to walk into a zone reeking with trouble. Called asking for it where I come from.
Protesters waving signs are "asking" to be hurt by troops?
You really are going off the deep end. I suggest you reread the First Amendment.
What weenie phrase would you all it? Searching for social justice? No, can’t be that, because that takes stuff from people and gives it to other people, which s hardly justice.
What would you call it?
First amendmeNt does not protect “in your face”. Would not apply.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou're demented. Of course the First Amendment applies to protests against government policies even if that means "getting in the face" of ICE goons.
Yes, as they are taking/assuming a risk, to walk into a zone reeking with trouble. Called asking for it where I come from.
What weenie phrase would you all it? Searching for social justice? No, can’t be that, because that takes stuff from people and gives it to other people, which s hardly justice.
What would you call it?
First amendmeNt does not protect “in your face”. Would not apply.
@no1marauder saidDoes it include throwing rocks and bottles and at them and shining laser beams in their eyes? Or tossing professional-grade explosive fireworks at them? Or setting their vehicles and buildings on fire? Or blocking streets so residents can't get to their homes? Yelling on bullhorns at all hours of the night right outside residences for months on end?
You're demented. Of course the First Amendment applies to protests against government policies even if that means "getting in the face" of ICE goons.
Does it include all that?
@no1marauder saidSo a police officer (ICE) while doing his duty of enforcing US law is a “goon”?
You're demented. Of course the First Amendment applies to protests against government policies even if that means "getting in the face" of ICE goons.
You are antiAmerican!
1 edit
@Cliff-Mashburn saidFrom reliable reports, almost all violent events at the protests have been triggered by ICE agents, poorly trained as they are, using excessive force like tossing flash bang grenades, indiscriminately spraying tear gas and other chemical agents and in general acting like lawless thugs.https://www.npr.org/2025/10/13/nx-s1-5566785/ice-dhs-immigration-tactics-more-violent
Does it include throwing rocks and bottles and at them and shining laser beams in their eyes? Or tossing professional-grade explosive fireworks at them? Or setting their vehicles and buildings on fire? Or blocking streets so residents can't get to their homes? Yelling on bullhorns at all hours of the night right outside residences for months on end?
Does it include all that?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidYour servile nature has already been noted. Federal agents are barred from using excessive force by law, however, and those who do so anyway are properly described as "goons".
So a police officer (ICE) while doing his duty of enforcing US law is a “goon”?
You are antiAmerican!
@no1marauder saidThere is where you are wrong…Fed agents can use DEADLY force if need be.
Your servile nature has already been noted. Federal agents are barred from using excessive force by law, however, and those who do so anyway are properly described as "goons".
When did you become antiAmerican?
Why don’t you leave? You and your kind will never overthrow this country.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNot merely because someone waves a sign at them.
There is where you are wrong…Fed agents can use DEADLY force if need be.
When did you become antiAmerican?
Why don’t you leave? You and your kind will never overthrow this country.
Resistance to governmental overreach is what created the country.
@no1marauder saidBoth statements are not true.
Not merely because someone waves a sign at them.
Resistance to governmental overreach is what created the country.
They are doing more than waving signs.
Enforcing law is not over reach.
You having to lie about this proves you are wrong and you know it.
@Mott-The-Hoople said"He has erected a multitude of new offices and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance."
There is where you are wrong…Fed agents can use DEADLY force if need be.
When did you become antiAmerican?
Why don’t you leave? You and your kind will never overthrow this country.