Go back
Bush Gore and Brain  Power

Bush Gore and Brain Power

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Delmer
Libertarian, wib, libertarian... a third choice.
Green Party - Ralph Nader

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sword4damocles
Green Party - Ralph Nader
Certainly, there are many choices other than the Democrats and Republicans.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Delmer
Certainly, there are many choices other than the Democrats and Republicans.
Yep...hmmm, I have an idea for a thread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

the Zeeblebot party platform.

workfare mandatory in the absence of employment.

electronic money, everywhere.

taxes all calculated by the IRS (no more TurboTax) and held to 10 percent.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 667joe
After Watching Al Gore's movie,I was struck by how bright, inquisitive, curious and thoughtful Gore is. I got sick to my stomach that we are stuck with Bush, a total moron, with no intellectual curiousity, not appreciation for learning, no inkling of the principles of science, and no sense of the future. (Bush thinks you can prevent pregnacy by not using condoms!)
Definitely. One certainly misses having a leader that is capable of formulating coherent, complex thoughts in complete sentences, one who does not fear complexity. And Gore certainly is one of the politicians who took a leading role on Global warming long before anyone was taking it seriously.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Delmer
Libertarian, wib, libertarian... a third choice.
I agree Delmer. And I agree with the Libertarian stance on many issues. Especially social issues. The problem is in the end, for the major political offices, I have only dems and repubs to choose from here in Virginia. The repubs are extremely powerful here and many incumbents run unopposed due to the gerrymandering of districts.

I subscribe to the Libertarian Newsletter, I get an email from them at leats once per month. And I really do like their positions on many issues, but for the life of me I never hear anything about them from any other source.

I voted for Harry Browne a few elections ago for president. He actually made the ballot here. Of course he gathered, I believe, less than 1% of the vote. So I always end up feeling like I simply voted against a democrat whenever I vote for a libertarian. Know what I mean?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wib
I agree Delmer. And I agree with the Libertarian stance on many issues. Especially social issues. The problem is in the end, for the major political offices, I have only dems and repubs to choose from here in Virginia. The repubs are extremely powerful here and many incumbents run unopposed due to the gerrymandering of districts.

I subscribe to the Liber ...[text shortened]... ing like I simply voted against a democrat whenever I vote for a libertarian. Know what I mean?
I do understand what you mean and glad to hear that you voted for Harry Browne. It's sort of strange to me that states can individually set the parameters for what's needed to get on the ballot for national offices. At least I think that's true. If not I'm sure someone will correct me. I keep waiting for someone to bring forth a case that will reach the Supreme Court and perhaps standardize what's needed to make the ballot for national offices. There were quite a few Libertarians on the Michigan ballot last time. I don't know how much support they got but as long as they are there I'll vote for them.