1. Joined
    07 Mar '09
    Moves
    27933
    11 Apr '12 03:04
    Now everything is clear! George Bush has disavowed George Bush. Romney will shortly be repudiating everything he said before he was shaken and not stirred. In a matter of weeks Palin will announce her run on the Socialist Worker's Party ticket! The glorious revolution of repudiating everything that won't get you elected can begin. George Bush can ask, "Would you want one like me marrying your daughter? You've already paid for what you don't know."
  2. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    11 Apr '12 03:411 edit
    Originally posted by TerrierJack
    Now everything is clear! George Bush has disavowed George Bush. Romney will shortly be repudiating everything he said before he was shaken and not stirred. In a matter of weeks Palin will announce her run on the Socialist Worker's Party ticket! The glorious revolution of repudiating everything that won't get you elected can begin. George Bush can ask, " ...[text shortened]... you want one like me marrying your daughter? You've already paid for what you don't know."
    Did you read the whole quote?

    He's saying that because it bears his name it becomes more controversial and so is less likely to be made permanent (and he's probably right). He's not disavowing anything.
  3. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    11 Apr '12 14:12
    Originally posted by sh76
    Did you read the whole quote?

    He's saying that because it bears his name it becomes more controversial and so is less likely to be made permanent (and he's probably right). He's not disavowing anything.
    They'll be made permanent. If it was the Adolf Hitler-Josef Stalin TAX CUTS it would be made permanent. So long as the words "TAX CUTS" are affixed to anything, they are sacrosanct.
  4. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    15 Apr '12 23:49
    MOriginally posted by sh76
    Did you read the whole quote?

    He's saying that because it bears his name it becomes more controversial and so is less likely to be made permanent (and he's probably right). He's not disavowing anything.
    Obama, in the lame duck session, could have let the "Bush" tax cuts expire. He did not asked for an extension recognizing across the board tax increases would harm an already fragile economy. His words.

    From no on, these should be known as the Obama tax cuts. If they are ever repealed, will they repeal the cuts at the lower marginal rates too, or the increases in EITC?
  5. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    16 Apr '12 00:22
    Originally posted by normbenign
    Obama, in the lame duck session, could have let the "Bush" tax cuts expire. He did not asked for an extension recognizing across the board tax increases would harm an already fragile economy. His words.

    From no on, these should be known as the Obama tax cuts. If they are ever repealed, will they repeal the cuts at the lower marginal rates too, or the increases in EITC?
    What I don't get are liberals who have no problem with the government printing trillions of dollars for deficits, but have a stroke everytime someone mentions a tax cut. Then you have Republicans who have a stroke when the government spends trillions over budget, but insist on tax breaks.

    Together they both ensure tax cuts coupled with fiscal insantiy. It is the best of both worlds. 😕
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree