Do you wish our elected officials in Washington would show just a little more responsibility? A little more ethics?
Then here's a website for you!
C.R.E.W. -- Citizens for Responsibilty and Ethics in Washington
https://www.citizensforethics.org/
If you're truly a believer in better responsibilty and ethics in Washington, then you'll want to bookmark this site and keep coming back to see how this organization fights FOR YOU!
@mott-the-hoople saidAnd if you read it....
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/citizens-responsibility-ethics-washington-crew/
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
@wolfgang59 saidYes they have a bias, they report story x but turn a blind eye to story y.
And if you read it....
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
@wolfgang59 saidThere's a site reporting bias in a source, you tell us the site is reporting bias in a source.
No $hit Sherlock!
But what they do report on is highly factual.
You're the wannabe Sherlock telling us what we already know.
@mott-the-hoople said"In review, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) republishes news articles from left leaning sources such as Newsweek and The Daily Beast. Under their blog category they publish stories with emotionally loaded headlines such as 'HAS WILBUR ROSS FULLY DIVESTED FROM THE CONTROVERSIAL BANK OF CYPRUS?' However, they utilize credible least biased sources such Center for Public Integrity, state.gov.com and other credible left leaning mainstream sources such as NY Times, Bloomberg, Business Insider, The Guardian, and Mother Jones. In general, CREW’s information slightly favors the left through story selection and the use of left leaning sources. Therefore, we rate them high for factual reporting and left-center biased due to heavily sourcing from left leaning sources. (M. Huitsing 1/12/2018)"
a wolf in sheeps clothing...
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/citizens-responsibility-ethics-washington-crew/
@kevcvs57 saidkev, pollies are without exception in the least 10 trusted professions anywhere in the world. The site C.R.E.W. have an acknowledged bias so they're not fighting for everyone, they're not neutral, it's worth noting before contributing to their cause or consuming their product.
That doesn’t detract from the truth in story X though, if you want to read story Y there’s always Fox and Breitbart.
@handyandy saidNYT is a " credible source" ? 🙄
"In review, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) republishes news articles from left leaning sources such as Newsweek and The Daily Beast. Under their blog category they publish stories with emotionally loaded headlines such as 'HAS WILBUR ROSS FULLY DIVESTED FROM THE CONTROVERSIAL BANK OF CYPRUS?' However, they utilize credible least biased sources s ...[text shortened]... g and left-center biased due to heavily sourcing from left leaning sources. (M. Huitsing 1/12/2018)"
@mott-the-hoople saidAbsolutely! Get someone to read it to you sometime.
NYT is a " credible source" ? 🙄
@wajoma saidI think Your missing the point wajoma the fact they’ve acknowledged their bias is what makes them a reliable source.
kev, pollies are without exception in the least 10 trusted professions anywhere in the worldThe site C.R.E.W. have an acknowledged bias so they're not fighting for everyone, they're not neutral, it's worth noting before contributing to their cause or consuming their product.
“pollies are without exception in the least 10 trusted professions anywhere in the world”
Your really not from the uk are you mate, they hit the number one spot here a while back and they’ve still got a bullet.