Calling No1 Marauder

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I have the heart of a lion, but thanks for your concern.

@Suzianne said
I want laws that are based on the Constitution, dumbass.

so where in the constitution does it say the govt has control over a parent/ child relationship and decisions?

you freaks need to leave children alone!

@mchill said
When MAGA's find they are losing a debate, they unfailingly resort to juvenile name calling, and it stings them even more to lose to a lady so you can put this one in the win category for you.


- and speaking of wins, congrats on that win vs Dr. Gonzo. Your middlegame tactics are improving.

Thank you, Mr. McHill.

But I think I need to see more of the board at a time. Maybe slow down a bit.

I let two opportunities to take his queen pass me by, one for a rook, and one for a bishop, and I saw neither.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I'd view it more akin to putting up a bat-signal.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
A California law was struck down, scotus is not making any law. The decision PREVENTS California teachers from HIDING this from parents.

Why do you freaks want to do harm to children?

Jeez. This is a twisted word salad. Prevents teachers from hiding? That means teachers must report. It's a mandate, and it's absurd to claim the constitution says that.

@wildgrass said
Jeez. This is a twisted word salad. Prevents teachers from hiding? That means teachers must report. It's a mandate, and it's absurd to claim the constitution says that.

That's not quite accurate.

The policy was the school was forbidden to inform the parents that the student had requested transgender pronouns be used for them without the student's consent. It's unclear whether this preliminary stay determination leaves it to school's discretion now or requires the school to inform.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
so where in the constitution does it say the govt has control over a parent/ child relationship and decisions?

you freaks need to leave children alone!

So you're opposed to laws preventing parents from getting gender affirming treatments for their minor children? That's the government having control over a parent/child relationship and decisions, isn't it?

@no1marauder said
So you're opposed to laws preventing parents from getting gender affirming treatments for their minor children? That's the government having control over a parent/child relationship and decisions, isn't it?

along the same avenue that the govt wont let parents kill their children

@wildgrass said
Jeez. This is a twisted word salad. Prevents teachers from hiding? That means teachers must report. It's a mandate, and it's absurd to claim the constitution says that.

"Jeez. This is a twisted word salad. Prevents teachers from hiding? That means teachers must report. '


no it doesn't.

if asked they must not hide it

@Suzianne said
It's that "unrelated to legal procedures" that bothers me.

With a precedent like this, they could whip out a reasoning for any decision based on their whims. Not the Constitution, which is basically their only job.

The Constitution isn't a source of Natural
Rights. They existed before it and cannot be legitimately reduced by Man made written documents.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
along the same avenue that the govt wont let parents kill their children

You're inconsistent. The California policy at issue in the OP was to protect children from possible mistreatment, including violence, from their parents.

Becoming transgender is not akin to being murdered.

@no1marauder said
The Constitution isn't a source of Natural
Rights. They existed before it and cannot be legitimately reduced by Man made written documents.

No such thing as natural rights

@no1marauder said
You're inconsistent. The California policy at issue in the OP was to protect children from possible mistreatment, including violence, from their parents.

Becoming transgender is not akin to being murdered.

No it wasnt

@Mott-The-Hoople said
"Jeez. This is a twisted word salad. Prevents teachers from hiding? That means teachers must report. '


no it doesn't.

if asked they must not hide it

If asked by a parent (what a weird question), and knowing that the student has previously asked the teacher not to tell the parents, this would raise some HUGE red flags regarding what's happening in that kids home life.

It seems like the particular situation you describe would be exceedingly rare. Teachers should be calling child protective services.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
No such thing as natural rights

The Founders and Framers disagreed with your POV..