Originally posted by TheBloopThat's not superficial, is it?
Originally posted by treetalk
[b]Ahh - would you be bleating this way if it was an unwed Chelsea Clinton that was pregnant?
Did you ever SEE Chelsea when she was in the White House? Ugggghhh! Nasty![/b]
Back to the family values issues if a 17 year old Chelsea were pregnant ...
Originally posted by treetalk
Back to the family values issues if a 17 year old Chelsea were pregnant ...
Oh, you're being serious?
*straightens tie*
Ahem, well then, it would be no surprise at all if she had the baby killed. Conservatives would be pleasantly surprised if she decided otherwise. (We'd still wonder if Bill was the father though).
Originally posted by SleepyguyBecause he fooled around on his wife?
Originally posted by treetalk
[b]
Back to the family values issues if a 17 year old Chelsea were pregnant ...
Oh, you're being serious?
*straightens tie*
Ahem, well then, it would be no surprise at all if she had the baby killed. Conservatives would be pleasantly surprised if she decided otherwise. (We'd still wonder if Bill was the father though).[/b]
So if John McCain's daughter has a kid, you'd wonder about whether John was the father?
1 edit
Originally posted by treetalk...we would all be shocked!
That's not superficial, is it?
Back to the family values issues if a 17 year old Chelsea were pregnant ...
But all kidding aside, of course she would have had the baby killed.
But the MSM never touched Chelsea when she was in the White House, because Bill and Hillary asked them not to.
Besides, how do you know she WASN'T pregnant during those years? The press would have gladly ignored the story, and she would have had the baby killed asap.
1 edit
Originally posted by treetalkBecause he is a sex addict?
Because he fooled around on his wife?
Gennifer Flowers, Dolly Browning, Connie Hamzy, Monica Lewinsky, Sally Perdue, Bobbie Ann Williams, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and so on ...
Is it really out of the question that our commander in briefs might look at 17 year old Chelsea and think"Yeah, I'd hit that."
Originally posted by TheBloopYou mean an abortion? So, fetuses are now classified as babies? How do you know what she would have done had she been pregnant? Making wild speculative guesses to solidify your opinions on the Clintons?
...we would all be shocked!
But all kidding aside, of course she would have had the baby killed.
But the MSM never touched Chelsea when she was in the White House, because Bill and Hillary asked them not to.
Besides, how do you know she WASN'T pregnant during those years? The press would have gladly ignored the story, and she would have had the baby killed asap.
I'm sure the MSM with it's liberal leanings (🙄 - despite overwhelming proof to the contrary, it's amazing you still hold to that) never touched Chelsea on Bill and Hillary's say so.
Left the attacks to the likes of Rush Limbaugh, I guess.
Originally posted by SleepyguySo this supposed sex addict would consider incest? Are you that pathetic to honestly entertain that?
Because he is a sex addict?
Gennifer Flowers, Dolly Browning, Connie Hamzy, Monica Lewinsky, Sally Perdue, Bobbie Ann Williams, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and so on ...
Is it really out of the question that our commander in briefs might look at 17 year old Chelsea and think"Yeah, I'd hit that."
But McCain - being just a cheater on his wife and not a sex addict - wouldn't consider his daughter in that way?
Originally posted by Eladarwhat year is this? is it still 2008? is this seriously your opinion?
I think that most women should be at home raising their children instead of allowing others to do it (at best) or having the kids raise themselves (at worst).
But most women go the way of "self fullment" and "money" chasing things that are really less important.
1 edit
Originally posted by treetalkOh I don't think its LIKELY, but I wouldn't put any depraved act beneath old slick Willy. There's a bit more wrong with that dude than your normal politician who sleeps around.
So this supposed sex addict would consider incest? Are you that pathetic to honestly entertain that?
But McCain - being just a cheater on his wife and not a sex addict - wouldn't consider his daughter in that way?
As for McCain, Giulani, Gingrich, and the many politicians on either side of the aisle who can't keep it in their pants, they are all pathetic on this score, not to mention how many are just downright corrupt. The fact is, most of our politicians suck, and this issue with Palin's teenage daughter is small potatoes.
Originally posted by kirksey957she put her into a common curse by naming her this. you see, the majority of women named peggy are fat. the majority of todds that are gay is larger than the avg.
Bristol, a daughter. Bristol is the name of a city or a motor speedway in Virginia. Would you name a daughter Talledega?
if you name someone a trash name, they will get pregnant early. usually 16, maybe she got retard #2 in her right before she turned 17? either way, they should just read your abstinence via anal only, the BWA bestseller. it has full BNL endorsement. (esp. smookiep 😞)
Originally posted by EladarShould men be at home raising children too, then?
I think that most women should be at home raising their children instead of allowing others to do it (at best) or having the kids raise themselves (at worst).
But most women go the way of "self fullment" and "money" chasing things that are really less important.
I'm sorry, but I just don't think you can trust a household where this sort of immoral behaviour is allowed.
Either that or Mrs Palin has no control over her own family.
Sex before marriage is a sin in the eyes of our Glorious Father.
Palin should be cast-out of the Republican party forthwith.