Calling out family value lovers

Originally posted by Eladar
I think that most women should be at home raising their children instead of allowing others to do it (at best) or having the kids raise themselves (at worst).

But most women go the way of "self fullment" and "money" chasing things that are really less important.

Should Palin stay at home and raise her family then?

Originally posted by kirksey957
Plus, we should ask will she have enough time to raise a special needs infant and an acting out teenager? I think she should have spent more time at home providing structure for her family instead of shooting guns in Iraq.

Since no one would think of asking a male VP candidate to do that, the question is obviously sexist and ill-advised.

Originally posted by Eladar
I think that most women should be at home raising their children instead of allowing others to do it (at best) or having the kids raise themselves (at worst).

But most women go the way of "self fullment" and "money" chasing things that are really less important.

How 'bout letting the FATHER stay home "raising their children"? How would that be?

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
Since no one would think of asking a male VP candidate to do that, the question is obviously sexist and ill-advised.

Shouldn't that be directed at Eladar?

Originally posted by treetalk
Shouldn't that be directed at Eladar?

Aye.

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
I'm sorry, but I just don't think you can trust a household where this sort of immoral behaviour is allowed.
Either that or Mrs Palin has no control over her own family.
Sex before marriage is a sin in the eyes of our Glorious Father.
Palin should be cast-out of the Republican party forthwith.

Apparently invading an oil rich country isn't a sin in the eyes of Palin, who's said it was God's will for the US to invade Iraq. Perhaps God is an oil businessman who created Bush and Cheney in his own image.

Originally posted by Sleepyguy
Precisely DSR.

If her parents were liberals they'd just make the young mother aware of her "right to choose" to pay someone from NARAL to kill her baby. The conservative family encourages her to take responsibility for her choices, and then welcomes the new life into the family.

Of course! More future conservatives!

Hey, it's worked for catholics for hundreds of years now...

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
Since no one would think of asking a male VP candidate to do that, the question is obviously sexist and ill-advised.

I think you misunderstood where I was going. For years and years, the likes of people like Doctor Laura, Rush Limbaugh, etc have been admonishing women that they would be more fulfilled in living out their mothering roles in being the caretakers of the family. People like Sarah Palin and everyone in her Assemblies of God church believe that kind of thinking. "Doctor" Laura has as much said that women need to stay at home at raise the family. Conservatives have long been in an "ass-licking" mood with the likes of "Doctor" Laura and Limbaugh. But now that this situation has arisen, for some reason they whistle a different tune.

Last night we heard the victim role of how the evil liberal biased media and the leftist, socialist Democrats are persecuting this poor family woman and holding her back. Bullcrap! In reality , Sarah Palin and her following cannot follow the same standards they set for other people. That, my friend, was my point.