31 Oct 16
Originally posted by Metal BrainAs long as Comey does not cause her demise all is well.
If Hillary becomes president can she fire Comey or is she stuck with him?
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/hillary_not_fit_to_run_fbi_according_to_standard_set_by_bill_clinton.html
All Hillary wants is power. We all know that nothing will ever come of this, nothing ever does in Washington.
All this does is stir the pot and create much needed ratings for the state run news.
31 Oct 16
Originally posted by Metal BrainThe President can fire the FBI Director for any reason:
If Hillary becomes president can she fire Comey or is she stuck with him?
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/hillary_not_fit_to_run_fbi_according_to_standard_set_by_bill_clinton.html
But, as a Congressional Research Service study of the director’s office pointed out two years ago, “there are no statutory conditions on the President’s authority to remove the FBI director.”
The constitutional reality is that, if a government official is clearly placed within the Executive Branch, that official serves at the pleasure of the President, and can be fired “at will.”
http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2016/10/how-independent-is-the-fbis-director/
Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions in 1993.
Originally posted by Metal BrainTechnically, yes.
If Hillary becomes president can she fire Comey or is she stuck with him?
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/hillary_not_fit_to_run_fbi_according_to_standard_set_by_bill_clinton.html
So much easier for her to kill his ass, however.
CORRECTION: Have his ass killed.
31 Oct 16
Originally posted by no1marauderYes, the Clintons like to Fire FBI directors.
The President can fire the FBI Director for any reason:
But, as a Congressional Research Service study of the director’s office pointed out two years ago, “there are no statutory conditions on the President’s authority to remove the FBI director.”
The constitutional reality is that, if a government official is clearly placed within the Executive ...[text shortened]... w-independent-is-the-fbis-director/
Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions in 1993.
I wonder why.
31 Oct 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI think you will find that Hillary will be able to do pretty much anything she wants when elected.
Technically, yes.
So much easier for her to kill his ass, however.
CORRECTION: Have his ass killed.
First she must fire all those in opposition and then she will be free to rule with a rod of iron.
03 Nov 16
Originally posted by no1marauder"Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions in 1993."
The President can fire the FBI Director for any reason:
But, as a Congressional Research Service study of the director’s office pointed out two years ago, “there are no statutory conditions on the President’s authority to remove the FBI director.”
The constitutional reality is that, if a government official is clearly placed within the Executive ...[text shortened]... w-independent-is-the-fbis-director/
Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions in 1993.
Yes, I posted a link about it. I also pointed out that Bill fired him 1 day before Vince Foster's dead body was found and referred to the documentary "Bill Clinton, His Life" and how the FBI could not investigate his death because of the firing. Convenient for the Clinton Crime Family.
That film also pointed out that Bill fired all the judges in a certain part of government without reason to have them replaced, but the film did not explain that unless I missed something. Do you know what his motive was?
Originally posted by Metal BrainGreat theory. Unfortunately:
"Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions in 1993."
Yes, I posted a link about it. I also pointed out that Bill fired him 1 day before Vince Foster's dead body was found and referred to the documentary "Bill Clinton, His Life" and how the FBI could not investigate his death because of the firing. Convenient for the Clinton Crime Family.
That ...[text shortened]... d, but the film did not explain that unless I missed something. Do you know what his motive was?
https://vault.fbi.gov/vincent-foster/vincent-foster-part-01-of-04/view
https://vault.fbi.gov/vincent-foster/vincent-foster-part-02-of-04/view
https://vault.fbi.gov/vincent-foster/vincent-foster-part-03-of-04/view
That's 658 pages of materials from the FBI investigations of Vincent Foster's death.
03 Nov 16
Originally posted by whodeyOne: with the coup currently underway as the lying sack of soetoro Obama leaves office, there's a very good likelihood Clinton will either implode spontaneously when indicted before the election.
I think you will find that Hillary will be able to do pretty much anything she wants when elected.
First she must fire all those in opposition and then she will be free to rule with a rod of iron.
Two: with her supporters leaving in droves, she very well might be forced to do exactly what the Chicago Tribune called upon her to do, namely, step aside and let her running mate face the election.
It is doubtful that anyone who wasn't already convinced of her criminal activity could possibly deny the same any longer.
It takes a willful opposition to reality to cast a vote for her.
As a former FBI director accurately stated: during times of war, others who acted in similar fashion were put before firing squads.
Can someone get Hilary a cigarette, please?
Virginia Slim's!
Menthol, dammit!
03 Nov 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWut? We have many in the GOP saying they will vote for Hillary.
One: with the coup currently underway as the lying sack of soetoro Obama leaves office, there's a very good likelihood Clinton will either implode spontaneously when indicted before the election.
Two: with her supporters leaving in droves, she very well might be forced to do exactly what the Chicago Tribune called upon her to do, namely, step aside and ...[text shortened]... firing squads.
Can someone get Hilary a cigarette, please?
Virginia Slim's!
Menthol, dammit!
I see no opposition that is noteworthy.