Mr. Whitaker has not been named to some junior post one or two levels below the Justice Department’s top job. He has now been vested with the law enforcement authority of the entire United States government, including the power to supervise Senate-confirmed officials like the deputy attorney general, the solicitor general and all United States attorneys.
I'd like to hear from the legal guy's here on this. SH76 and No1Maruder - Does the new A.G. have the right to simply step in and run everything an A.G. normally does without Senate Confirmation? Does his past comments and deeds about the Mueller probe weigh into this at all, or is it just noise? Are there any other legal hurdles he needs to jump over before he takes this job permanently? I'd like to hear from the lawyers on this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/opinion/trump-attorney-general-sessions-unconstitutional.html
@mchill saidDue to his past comments about Mueller's investigation, he should probably recuse himself as Sessions did, but he knows that'll put a burr in his boss's shorts, so I doubt he will.
Mr. Whitaker has not been named to some junior post one or two levels below the Justice Department’s top job. He has now been vested with the law enforcement authority of the entire United States government, including the power to supervise Senate-confirmed officials like the deputy attorney general, the solicitor general and all United States attorneys.
I'd like to hear fr ...[text shortened]...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/opinion/trump-attorney-general-sessions-unconstitutional.html
@mchill saidWhitaker can serve without Senate confirmation for 210 days.
Mr. Whitaker has not been named to some junior post one or two levels below the Justice Department’s top job. He has now been vested with the law enforcement authority of the entire United States government, including the power to supervise Senate-confirmed officials like the deputy attorney general, the solicitor general and all United States attorneys.
I'd like to hear fr ...[text shortened]...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/opinion/trump-attorney-general-sessions-unconstitutional.html
He's there to protect Trump until a qualified AG is appointed.
@handyandy saidoh poor baby... LOL
Whitaker can serve without Senate confirmation for 210 days.
He's there to protect Trump until a qualified AG is appointed.
@mchill saidWhat HandyAndy said.
Mr. Whitaker has not been named to some junior post one or two levels below the Justice Department’s top job. He has now been vested with the law enforcement authority of the entire United States government, including the power to supervise Senate-confirmed officials like the deputy attorney general, the solicitor general and all United States attorneys.
I'd like to hear fr ...[text shortened]...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/opinion/trump-attorney-general-sessions-unconstitutional.html
He can serve for up to 210 days before Trump has to either appoint someone new or get him confirmed by the Senate.
Until then, he can do anything an AG could do. He is acting AG.
I don't think his past comments about Mueller will matter much except insofar as it may make some Senators less likely to confirm him.
Still, with (likely) 53 or 54 GOP senators, none of which are named Corker, Flake or McCain, I imagine Trump could get a ham sandwich confirmed as AG at this point.
@sh76 saidWhy isn't there just an immediate vote on the interim appointment?
What HandyAndy said.
He can serve for up to 210 days before Trump has to either appoint someone new or get him confirmed by the Senate.
Until then, he can do anything an AG could do. He is acting AG.
I don't think his past comments about Mueller will matter much except insofar as it may make some Senators less likely to confirm him.
Still, with (likely) 53 or 54 GOP ...[text shortened]... med Corker, Flake or McCain, I imagine Trump could get a ham sandwich confirmed as AG at this point.
@kazetnagorra saidTime is needed to locate his rape accuser.
Why isn't there just an immediate vote on the interim appointment?
@kazetnagorra saidyou are displaying complete ignorance of how our system works.
Why isn't there just an immediate vote on the interim appointment?
@kazetnagorra saidhttps://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44997.pdf
Why isn't there just an immediate vote on the interim appointment?
This refers to the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. See Page 11.