@vivify said
"Intent" is a very tough thing to prove. In cases where potentially offensive imagery is concerned all you can really do is err on the side of caution.
Imagine a Facebook group where mothers share pictures of their kids playing in a bathtub. It's not that it's wrong, it's that the potential for misuse is far too high. What if a group of dads want to share such pics; what ...[text shortened]... ackface as a relic of the past than to naïvely assume everyone using it just wants to play dress up.
Or better to view matters from the best of intentions, rather than starting from the negative.
The Vietnamse girl photo (running up a road from napalm bombardement: Phan Thị Kim Phúc) is nude.
It’s an absolutely horrific photograph. But stunningly capturing at the same time.
Do you suggest, because there could be creeps getting off on it, that it shouldn’t be shown?
If someone’s blackfacing to mock black people or keep them from working, I agree it’s wrong. If someone’s dressing up as a favourite character, then it’s no worse than dreasing like Brave Heart, a viking or a horse.
And that some people still get insulted by it, even though that’s not the intention, is not my cup of tea. I can’t be held responsible for other people’s lack of clarity on intent.
The Irish were oppressed for hundreds of years. Viciously so. You can’t dress up as leprechaun or a pint of Guiness on St. Patrick’s day?
I can’t laugh at the yada yada yada episode of Seinfeld… because I’m not Jewish?
Note the world you are then creating.