13 Nov '13 21:59>1 edit
Originally posted by twhiteheadI'd buy GM food - I don't see it as poisoned - but I do want it labelled, people pay a premium for organic food, if you want a market where you choose what you eat you need good labelling.
Surely such labelling is nothing but scare tactics? It would give the false impression that there is something special about GMO products and something to fear when consuming them.
So the question is why would someone want to carry out these scare tactics?
Is he sadly misinformed?
Is he trying to hurt particular companies like Monsanto?
Is he trying to benefit a particular industry like organic farmers?
What is his true motivation?
With skin care products listing the ingredients helps expensive products and with the cheaper ones, its the prices that's winning - not knowing whats in them is much worse, and soon enough they will add anything.
I remember going to the US and visiting Costco and they had a blue and white cake without a single natural ingredient, seemed like a dare to eat a slice, having seen that I think they should welcome labelling legislation, the more the better, let the consumers choose - with GM food price should be in the companies favour so they should list what's in it.
Just me but I would boycott a store period if it didn't say what was in its food. GM and e numbers are fine but I want to see what's there. The US is too lax on this they should look at what the UK does, we have better rules that include listing GM - the people who boycott GM are a minority who already go to other shops so nothing to fear from them.