Originally posted by Ragnorak
"If I photoshopped John McCain's face brown, would I get a comment from Ivanhoe, I wonder?"
You got it !
It has nothing to do with the colour of their faces/skin. It has to do with the colour of their shirts. That's why they are called "Brownshirts" and not "Brownfaces".
Trying to accuse me of racism while my intention at the time was to compare the techniques some are using here at RHP with the techniques the members of the Sturmabteilung of the NSDAP used in the streets of German cities during the thirties, shows a lack of historical knowledge and necessary insight.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownshirts
It is worth noticing that the SA techniques are still being used on this site today by the same members who in the past used it against RHP members, even against children. They usually do not use these techniques dwelling on their own (since it is a serious power game of intimidation and domination), but they operate in pairs or in threesomes or even in packs ..... yes indeed, the good old reliable wolfpack technique was revived after Bbarr returned to the forums and inspected his realm.
Ironically, the last victim of these practises, many many more preceded him, is the very prominent no1marauder, an occasional and experienced wolf-packer himself. Good old Dr. Scribbles and the man with old Nazi ideas in a brand-new jacket, Bbarr, managed to chase this wolf, a wannabee no1Wolf, away. In good old wolfpack fashion they struggled for power and the loser had to leave the arena, insulted, degraded and humiliated.
Just to rub it in and to celebrate the victory of just another succesful wolfpack action, Good old Dr. Scribbles opened a thread about this glorious event .... all in jest of course ....
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=68200&page=1
.. and look, some of the old experienced woolves and indeed some innocent sheep, unwary of what actually is going on, joined in and celebrated this coup .... and they all find it very entertaining indeed.
..... but no1 will be back ...... you see, he's not like the ones who were butchered before him .... he's a wolf, with a wolf mentality .... a wolf with nine lives so to speak .....
Eddie Vedder jumps from tv-mast into the crowd (02:20)
Originally posted by ivanhoeTrue. I remember we had a discussion about that quite a while ago where I actually argued your side, because your reference to the "Braunhemden" was quite clear to me as a German, and Ragnorak was quite clearly misinterpreting it.
Trying to accuse me of racism while my intention at the time was to compare the techniques some are using here at RHP with the techniques the members of the Sturmabteilung of the NSDAP used in the streets of German cities during the thirties, shows a lack of historical knowledge and necessary insight.
However, your constant accusations of nazism directed at some RHP members show an equal lack of historical knowledge and necessary insight.
Ironically, the last victim of these practises, many many more preceded him, is the very prominent no1marauder, an occasional and experienced wolf-packer himself.
Ha ha, that really made me laugh! I hope he comes back, if only to read your post. I am sure he'd love to see himself in the role of a victim, driven away from the site by Dr. Scribbles.
I quite like no.1 these days: he seems to be an astonishingly angry person at times, but he's invariably informative in the Debates forum once you penetrate past some of the personal attacks on both left and right, and my experience is that far from creating packs he tends to oppose the majority view on logical and coherent grounds - packs may form after that, but I think that owes as much to the strength of his arguments as any supposed inclination on his part. I can't comment on his debate in Spirituality, I shook the dust of that place from my feet a long time ago.
It's hard to say why he left, too - his other posts this last week indicate he may have been tired of the forums as a whole.
Originally posted by NordlysNordlys: "However, your constant accusations of nazism directed at some RHP members show an equal lack of historical knowledge and necessary insight."
True. I remember we had a discussion about that quite a while ago where I actually argued your side, because your reference to the "Braunhemden" was quite clear to me as a German, and Ragnorak was quite clearly misinterpreting it.
However, your constant accusations of nazism directed at some RHP members show an equal lack of historical knowledge and neces ...[text shortened]... he'd love to see himself in the role of a victim, driven away from the site by Dr. Scribbles.
Then I am surprised you didn't react in the thread I dedicated to the similarities between the Nazi-ideas regarding euthanasia during the twenties and thirties and Bbarr's ideas on this issue.
You still can, you know ..... maybe you can answer the question why there was so much political apathy towards these ideas in Germany from the side of the German intellectuals then in the twenties and thirties and why there is again so much political apathy from the side of the present intellectuals in Europe and the United States towards the present ideas.
Originally posted by ivanhoeThe self-proclaimed philosopher, bbarr, appears to be stuck in a bit of a rut with his doctural thesis on metaethics, for which the academic world must be anxiously awaiting. He seems to have been at it for the last 5 years.
[.. ..... yes indeed, the good old reliable wolfpack technique was revived after Bbarr returned to the forums and inspected his realm.
Originally posted by Thales2Interesting that you should think so, since you'd have us believe you've only been here since February this year.
The self-proclaimed philosopher, bbarr, appears to be stuck in a bit of a rut with his doctural thesis on metaethics, for which the academic world must be anxiously awaiting. He seems to have been at it for the last 5 years.
That's what ther forums are all about isn't it?
I know that's the only reason I come here .. to vent a little steam at fools like you.
You don't really expect to learn anything here do you?
These aren't "debates", they're simpley a place we come to slag each others opinions off, name calling and lies are the norm of the day .. with websites to "prove" we are right.
no!moron got slammed ... BFD, he's about as much a lawyer as bbarr is a philospher ... mostly in there own mind. You don't really believe that a top flight lawyer or philospher would bother "debating" all the BS posted here by children .. do you?
These guys are clever (to school children), but basicly losers at what they do.
PS .. you guys suck
Originally posted by Nordlys..... in close cooperation with Bbarr.
Ironically, the last victim of these practises, many many more preceded him, is the very prominent no1marauder, an occasional and experienced wolf-packer himself.
Ha ha, that really made me laugh! I hope he comes back, if only to read your post. I am sure he'd love to see himself in the role of a victim, driven away from the site by Dr. Scribbles.[/b]
Originally posted by ivanhoeI read the thread with some interest and considered stepping in, but I didn't know enough about bbarr's ideas on the issue, so I rather let him speak for himself. He did a pretty good job.
Nordlys: "However, your constant accusations of nazism directed at some RHP members show an equal lack of historical knowledge and necessary insight."
Then I am surprised you didn't react in the thread I dedicated to the similarities between the Nazi-ideas regarding euthanasia during the twenties and thirties and Bbarr's ideas on this issue.
And yes, I might still go back to the thread and contribute if I have the time, but I am quite busy at the moment, and to make a meaningful contribution I'd have to take my time, find some relevant sources etc.
Originally posted by AmauroteI agree; no1 never seemed to be someone who tried to ingratiate himself with the crowd, and he'd insult friend and foe alike when they disagreed with him. As for being informative, he was one of the few people in the forums who went to some length to research the subject he was discussing, not just linking to the next best video or Wikipedia article he could find by googling.
I quite like no.1 these days: he seems to be an astonishingly angry person at times, but he's invariably informative in the Debates forum once you penetrate past some of the personal attacks on both left and right, and my experience is that far from creating packs he tends to oppose the majority view on logical and coherent grounds - packs may form after th ...[text shortened]... oo - his other posts this last week indicate he may have been tired of the forums as a whole.
He seemed rather bored with chess lately, too. So I guess he just has better things to do.
Originally posted by ivanhoeYou are one of the most disturbingly paranoid people I've ever had the
Originally posted by Ragnorak
[b]
"If I photoshopped John McCain's face brown, would I get a comment from Ivanhoe, I wonder?"
You got it !
It has nothing to do with the colour of their faces/skin. It has to do with the colour of their shirts. That's why they are called "Brownshirts" and not "Brownfaces".
Trying to accuse me of racism ...[text shortened]... umps from tv-mast into the crowd (02:20)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Wq6VeeYZQY[/b]
misfortune of interacting with, and that is saying a lot!
Nazis indeed. Like anyone other than Russ or Chris have any access to
any power.
You really are a piece of work.
Nemesio
P.S., Now, go ahead, whine and say that I am 'driving you from the site.'
I assure you the sound of your tears hitting your pillow at night will not
keep me from sleeping.
Originally posted by ivanhoeYou don't think that you and your ilk pack together??
Originally posted by Ragnorak
[b]
"If I photoshopped John McCain's face brown, would I get a comment from Ivanhoe, I wonder?"
You got it !
It has nothing to do with the colour of their faces/skin. It has to do with the colour of their shirts. That's why they are called "Brownshirts" and not "Brownfaces".
Trying to accuse me of racism ...[text shortened]... umps from tv-mast into the crowd (02:20)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Wq6VeeYZQY[/b]
Any time a member of RHP agrees with and ... 'sides' with another member means they're travelling in a wolf pack?
Quite the paranoid/persecution complex way of looking at things ...
Originally posted by NordlysI didn't agree with everything no1 said but I invariably learnt things from his postings. As you said, noodles, he was one of the few posters who could (and would) back up his posts with researched information.
I agree; no1 never seemed to be someone who tried to ingratiate himself with the crowd, and he'd insult friend and foe alike when they disagreed with him. As for being informative, he was one of the few people in the forums who went to some length to research the subject he was discussing, not just linking to the next best video or Wikipedia article he could ...[text shortened]... .
He seemed rather bored with chess lately, too. So I guess he just has better things to do.
I'm surprised he stayed as long as he did - trying to shine the light of reason and rational debate into the dark recesses of some of the members' minds here must have been frustrating.