19 Apr 21
@very-musty saidNo one here is qualified to answer that question.
[poll]9D55F26DE6E6FA481C92BAE06A377B87[/poll]
- Joined
- 14 Feb 09
- Moves
- 12541
@no1marauder saidNeither are the biased jurors.
No one here is qualified to answer that question.
...or the jurors who were told people would riot if they didn't find him guilty.
19 Apr 21
@very-musty saidHow are the jurors "biased"? They were selected with the consent of both the prosecution and the defense.
Neither are the biased jurors.
...or the jurors who were told people would riot if they didn't find him guilty.
Your second sentence isn't worth responding to.
@no1marauder saidYou are correct. No one here heard all the facts. Hard to understand I know.
No one here is qualified to answer that question.
@no1marauder saidWhy not? What else do you need other than eyes to decide this case?
No one here is qualified to answer that question.
@vivify saidI'm not that cool...I 'll stick my neck out, .......... Would Floyd have died sometime aa few hours later, after he might have driven off after he visited the store? From drugs or heart or oxygen?? That is, was he dying anyway, at the moment, or did his unplanned meeting with Chauvin hurry along his demise??
The only real debate on this case is whether he's guilty of murder or manslaughter.
Some juror is asking that As We Speak!
19 Apr 21
@vivify saidI'm sorry but no one here sat in the jury box heard all the testimony, looked at all the evidence and and observed the demeanor of all the witnesses. Thus, they are not qualified to render a verdict.
Why not? What else do you need other than eyes to decide this case?
@no1marauder saidTo render a legal verdict, no.
I'm sorry but no one here sat in the jury box heard all the testimony, looked at all the evidence and and observed the demeanor of all the witnesses. Thus, they are not qualified to render a verdict.
To discuss a trial that was televised live, video evidence of the killing was made widely available in it's entirety, and every significant detail of the case was detailed in the media? If you have eyes and can read, you're than qualified to discuss it.
19 Apr 21
@vivify saidThat wasn't the question the thread posed i.e. whether internet users can "discuss" it.
To render a legal verdict, no.
To discuss a trial that was televised live, video evidence of the killing was made widely available in it's entirety, and every significant detail of the case was detailed in the media? If you have eyes and can read, you're than qualified to discuss it.
19 Apr 21
@no1marauder saidThe OP also didn't ask for a legally binding opinion.
That wasn't the question the thread posed i.e. whether internet users can "discuss" it.
@vivify saidYeah, we all saw snippets of it. But Maybe we missed some day, vivify. An important nugget of what might have happened.???? E.G.,That video of the initial approach to the car, Floyd mouth wide open......Why, Vivify, was that a piece of gum, a bite of banana, or a drug in his mouth (an actualy point in the case).???? Oh, you missed that, .......culd have been a turning point. Why don't you go to the science forum, or with the girls at the bridge forum. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
To render a legal verdict, no.
To discuss a trial that was televised live, video evidence of the killing was made widely available in it's entirety, and every significant detail of the case was detailed in the media? If you have eyes and can read, you're than qualified to discuss it.
You are the worst. You have not respect for the law, to start with. I bet you are logging on to RHP from "The Street!!!"
No, loser, we are not qualified to discuss it.
@averagejoe1 saidIf you weren't caught posting fake videos and had to admit you fell for a fraud, I may have given a damn about your opinion.
Yeah, we all saw snippets of it. But Maybe we missed some day, vivify. An important nugget of what might have happened.???? E.G.,That video of the initial approach to the car, Floyd mouth wide open......Why, Vivify, was that a piece of gum, a bite of banana, or a drug in his mouth (an actualy point in the case).???? Oh, you missed that, .......culd have been a tur ...[text shortened]... et you are logging on to RHP from "The Street!!!"
No, loser, we are not qualified to discuss it.
Actually no, I still wouldn't.