Go back
Chauvin Verdict?

Chauvin Verdict?

Debates


Chauvin Verdict?

35% Not guilty
53% Guilty
12% Mix of both
17 votes • Final results


@very-musty said
[poll]9D55F26DE6E6FA481C92BAE06A377B87[/poll]
No one here is qualified to answer that question.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
No one here is qualified to answer that question.
Neither are the biased jurors.

...or the jurors who were told people would riot if they didn't find him guilty.


@very-musty said
Neither are the biased jurors.

...or the jurors who were told people would riot if they didn't find him guilty.
How are the jurors "biased"? They were selected with the consent of both the prosecution and the defense.

Your second sentence isn't worth responding to.


@no1marauder said
No one here is qualified to answer that question.
You are correct. No one here heard all the facts. Hard to understand I know.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
No one here is qualified to answer that question.
Why not? What else do you need other than eyes to decide this case?


The only real debate on this case is whether he's guilty of murder or manslaughter.


@vivify said
The only real debate on this case is whether he's guilty of murder or manslaughter.
I'm not that cool...I 'll stick my neck out, .......... Would Floyd have died sometime aa few hours later, after he might have driven off after he visited the store? From drugs or heart or oxygen?? That is, was he dying anyway, at the moment, or did his unplanned meeting with Chauvin hurry along his demise??
Some juror is asking that As We Speak!

Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
Why not? What else do you need other than eyes to decide this case?
I'm sorry but no one here sat in the jury box heard all the testimony, looked at all the evidence and and observed the demeanor of all the witnesses. Thus, they are not qualified to render a verdict.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
I'm sorry but no one here sat in the jury box heard all the testimony, looked at all the evidence and and observed the demeanor of all the witnesses. Thus, they are not qualified to render a verdict.
To render a legal verdict, no.

To discuss a trial that was televised live, video evidence of the killing was made widely available in it's entirety, and every significant detail of the case was detailed in the media? If you have eyes and can read, you're than qualified to discuss it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
To render a legal verdict, no.

To discuss a trial that was televised live, video evidence of the killing was made widely available in it's entirety, and every significant detail of the case was detailed in the media? If you have eyes and can read, you're than qualified to discuss it.
That wasn't the question the thread posed i.e. whether internet users can "discuss" it.


@no1marauder said
That wasn't the question the thread posed i.e. whether internet users can "discuss" it.
The OP also didn't ask for a legally binding opinion.


@vivify said
The OP also didn't ask for a legally binding opinion.
Exactly.

No1 be crazy sometimes 🤪


@vivify said
To render a legal verdict, no.

To discuss a trial that was televised live, video evidence of the killing was made widely available in it's entirety, and every significant detail of the case was detailed in the media? If you have eyes and can read, you're than qualified to discuss it.
Yeah, we all saw snippets of it. But Maybe we missed some day, vivify. An important nugget of what might have happened.???? E.G.,That video of the initial approach to the car, Floyd mouth wide open......Why, Vivify, was that a piece of gum, a bite of banana, or a drug in his mouth (an actualy point in the case).???? Oh, you missed that, .......culd have been a turning point. Why don't you go to the science forum, or with the girls at the bridge forum. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
You are the worst. You have not respect for the law, to start with. I bet you are logging on to RHP from "The Street!!!"
No, loser, we are not qualified to discuss it.

2 edits

@averagejoe1 said
Yeah, we all saw snippets of it. But Maybe we missed some day, vivify. An important nugget of what might have happened.???? E.G.,That video of the initial approach to the car, Floyd mouth wide open......Why, Vivify, was that a piece of gum, a bite of banana, or a drug in his mouth (an actualy point in the case).???? Oh, you missed that, .......culd have been a tur ...[text shortened]... et you are logging on to RHP from "The Street!!!"
No, loser, we are not qualified to discuss it.
If you weren't caught posting fake videos and had to admit you fell for a fraud, I may have given a damn about your opinion.

Actually no, I still wouldn't.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.