This is one of the most retarded threads I have ever encounterd. I keep checking it just to see if some one could say something, hell anything some what intelegent. Hell I settle for something on either side.
If you honestly can't see how bias this openning thread post was than you a G D retard.
you guys are bassing this whole thing on partisan rederic and a bunch of retard thinking, you guys are all about as retarded as the retards in washington.
Another point what the hell does it matter if someone fought or didn't fight in WWII or korea? When the hell has the war in Iraq or Afganistan been in any way like either of those wars. There are completly different.
I mean really thats like saying well the guy down my street one time fixed his lawnmower so I think he sould be able to work on my BMW.
I mean jesus tap dancing christ you all need to seriously shut the hell up and quit acting like a bunch of god damned retards.
Originally posted by AThousandYoungyour lists are worthless, YOU stfu.
And you haven't posted the "correct" stats, so stfu.
what point are you trying to prove, that liberals are clueless and so used to pulling the wool over each others' eyes that they think it works on everybody?:
(secret nest of Democratic National Committee / moveon.org operatives brainstorming on what stunts to pull today):
"i know! let's get a list of a bunch of democratic politicians who served in the military, and a list of republcan politicians who didn't serve in the military, and use them to show everybody that the war-hungry, hypocritical republicans don't serve in the military as much as the peace-loving democrats do. we can throw in a few draft-dodging Democrats and a few Republican war heroes to make it look like a valid statistical analysis."
Originally posted by zeeblebotThey're not "my" lists. I'm not trying to prove anything here except maybe that some stats are better than no stats.
your lists are worthless, YOU stfu.
what point are you trying to prove, that liberals are clueless and so used to pulling the wool over each others' eyes that they think it works on everybody?:
(secret nest of Democratic National Committee / moveon.org operatives brainstorming on what stunts to pull today):
"i know! let's get a list of a bunch ...[text shortened]... ocrats and a few Republican war heroes to make it look like a valid statistical analysis."
Originally posted by wibthey are not responsible for your lack of command of the english language.
Be sure and tell that to the Marines in Iraq. And after they finish kicking your @zz for that statement you can come back here and enlighten us with what a REAL BATTLE is.
iraq and afghanistan are not battles. they are wars, and now, occupations.
Originally posted by Hank Reardenand this is about the most ignorant post I have ever seen.
This is one of the most retarded threads I have ever encounterd. I keep checking it just to see if some one could say something, hell anything some what intelegent. Hell I settle for something on either side.
If you honestly can't see how bias this openning thread post was than you a G D retard.
you guys are bassing this whole thing on partisan re ...[text shortened]... you all need to seriously shut the hell up and quit acting like a bunch of god damned retards.
Originally posted by zeeblebotHow do you know they're cherry-picked?
stats that are cherrypicked are worse than no stats.
You either know of a 'balanced' list - in which case post it ... or the list which has been posted is accurate and you're just being disagreeable for ideological reasons.
Originally posted by treetalkAre we to have an exchange of lists debate?
How do you know they're cherry-picked?
You either know of a 'balanced' list - in which case post it ... or the list which has been posted is accurate and you're just being disagreeable for ideological reasons.
Someone did post a senate list. Is that good, or does another one need to be posted?
What again is the debate? Someone said something in regards to democrats having more veterans. What position are we supposed to be advancing?
Originally posted by Hank ReardenHey Hank, if you're going to post, as dumb as it may be, learn how to spell first.
This is one of the most retarded threads I have ever encounterd. I keep checking it just to see if some one could say something, hell anything some what intelegent. Hell I settle for something on either side.
If you honestly can't see how bias this openning thread post was than you a G D retard.
you guys are bassing this whole thing on partisan re ...[text shortened]... you all need to seriously shut the hell up and quit acting like a bunch of god damned retards.
I have found 6 errors.
I also found it ironic that you, of all people, call THEM retarded.
www.dictionary.com
Try it and maybe then we would start to take you seriously.🙄