@sonhouse saidNo it was not really sarcasm, it was ridicule in an attempt to convince people chem trails do not exist. He probably looked it up and saw all of the links saying they don't exist and they are condensation trails. If he looks harder he will find articles saying states banned chem trails that do not exist.
God, you really need reading comprehension 101, you can't recognize sarcasm when you hear it.
So even though states are banning chem trails government still will not admit they exist. They don't deny weather modification because they cannot, but they don't want to admit they are spraying aluminum oxide and other chemicals from planes to do their weather modification.
Wildgrass will not accept the bet. That is good enough for me. He will not deny chem trails exist anymore.
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidThe "chemtrails" theory is not supported by any credible scientific evidence:
No it was not really sarcasm, it was ridicule in an attempt to convince people chem trails do not exist. He probably looked it up and saw all of the links saying they don't exist and they are condensation trails. If he looks harder he will find articles saying states banned chem trails that do not exist.
So even though states are banning chem trails government still w ...[text shortened]... ass will not accept the bet. That is good enough for me. He will not deny chem trails exist anymore.
A 2016 survey of 77 leading atmospheric scientists and geochemists found that 76 out of 77 (98.7% ) had not encountered any evidence of a secret large-scale atmospheric spraying program.
The data cited by chemtrail proponents as "evidence" can be explained by well-understood physics and chemistry associated with typical aircraft contrail formation and flawed data sampling methods.
For such a widespread, secret program to exist, thousands of people (pilots, air traffic controllers, chemical manufacturers, etc.) would have to be involved, making it highly likely someone would blow the whistle.
Government agencies and scientific organizations, including NASA, the U.S. Air Force, the EPA, and the UK's Met Office, have repeatedly debunked the theory, explaining the phenomena are normal contrails.
(Our AI friend).
1 edit
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidWould you like to make a bet on it?
The "chemtrails" theory is not supported by any credible scientific evidence:
A 2016 survey of 77 leading atmospheric scientists and geochemists found that 76 out of 77 (98.7% ) had not encountered any evidence of a secret large-scale atmospheric spraying program.
The data cited by chemtrail proponents as "evidence" can be explained by well-understood physics a ...[text shortened]... repeatedly debunked the theory, explaining the phenomena are normal contrails.
(Our AI friend).
If I can prove chem trails exist before the end of the month you lose the bet. If I cannot prove that by the end of the month I lose the bet.
The loser of the bet will post a thread on this forum saying "I lost a bet to name of the winner of the bet) and this is why". Then a brief explanation of why the bet was lost is put forth.
Do you accept the bet?
@Metal-Brain saidDepending on what you mean by chem trails.
Would you like to make a bet on it?
If I can prove chem trails exist before the end of the month you lose the bet. If I cannot prove that by the end of the month I lose the bet.
The loser of the bet will post a thread on this forum saying "I lost a bet to name of the winner of the bet) and this is why". Then a brief explanation of why the bet was lost is put forth.
Do you accept the bet?
Are you talking about jumbo jets and the white stripes in the sky they leave behind?
If so, I’m takin’ that bet!
@Metal-Brain saidA state banning a thing does not constitute evidence that it exists. Have you heard a politician talk? They are constantly making stuff up.
No it was not really sarcasm, it was ridicule in an attempt to convince people chem trails do not exist. He probably looked it up and saw all of the links saying they don't exist and they are condensation trails. If he looks harder he will find articles saying states banned chem trails that do not exist.
So even though states are banning chem trails government still w ...[text shortened]... ass will not accept the bet. That is good enough for me. He will not deny chem trails exist anymore.
@Metal-Brain saidSure, knock yourself out.
Would you like to make a bet on it?
If I can prove chem trails exist before the end of the month you lose the bet. If I cannot prove that by the end of the month I lose the bet.
The loser of the bet will post a thread on this forum saying "I lost a bet to name of the winner of the bet) and this is why". Then a brief explanation of why the bet was lost is put forth.
Do you accept the bet?
@Metal-Brain saidTake your pick, sarcasm or ridicule, I'll take either one.
No it was not really sarcasm, it was ridicule in an attempt to convince people chem trails do not exist. He probably looked it up and saw all of the links saying they don't exist and they are condensation trails. If he looks harder he will find articles saying states banned chem trails that do not exist.
So even though states are banning chem trails government still w ...[text shortened]... ass will not accept the bet. That is good enough for me. He will not deny chem trails exist anymore.
@shavixmir saidChem is short for chemical. All I have to do is prove chemicals are being sprayed. Dry Ice has been used for many years. Is that a chemical?
Depending on what you mean by chem trails.
Are you talking about jumbo jets and the white stripes in the sky they leave behind?
If so, I’m takin’ that bet!
@wildgrass saidDo you accept the bet or not?
A state banning a thing does not constitute evidence that it exists. Have you heard a politician talk? They are constantly making stuff up.
No more BS denial. LBJ did not make his statement for nothing.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidDry ice is a chemical used for cloud seeding. So chem trails have existed as long as cloud seeding has existed.
I said sure.
My parameters of the bet relate to the OP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye