12 Dec 14
Originally posted by whodeyit's incredible how idiotic the online media has become. in about 10 articles about this story, not one was able or willing to give a single legal reason why the parents should pay the entitled little ashole her college tuition.
https://www.yahoo.com/parenting/dad-speaks-out-after-21-year-old-sues-him-to-pay-104864515872.html
It appears that now college is an entitement, only, the parents are the ones who have to pay.
the fact that a judge can wake up one morning and decide "today i am gonna set up 5 legal precedents unsubstantiated by actual law and just because i fukin want to" is insane.
the courts will not intervene in many states to force doctors to give life saving transfusions to jehovah's witnesses' children, just now there is a thread about children dying in idaho because of cult psychos using only faith healing. but a judge will force 2 adults to give money to another adult.
12 Dec 14
Originally posted by rwingettIn Denmark the government does not pass Draconian student debt laws that create a society of debt slaves that no one can escape, nor do they continue to lower interest rates so that Universities can continue to raise tuition rates unabated.
In Denmark, college is free.
Shrug. It sucks to be a left winged Obamite.
12 Dec 14
Originally posted by KazetNagorragrowing tendency? This tendency (of the well off probably beeing children of the well-off)is as old as mankind.
A sad reflection of a society with a suing culture out of control and a growing tendency to reward birth rather than talent or effort.
Just name a culture in which is was not true. (There are examples, but not too many, and most millionaires haven't begun as dishwashers)
12 Dec 14
Originally posted by KazetNagorrathat's not the concerning part.
A sad reflection of a society with a suing culture out of control and a growing tendency to reward birth rather than talent or effort.
the bigger issue here is how, as far as i know, this decision has no legal basis other than a precedent set in the 80's. the problem here is how a judge is allowed to set up these kinds of precedents.
12 Dec 14
Originally posted by PonderableIt's not new, but has not always been equally pronounced.
growing tendency? This tendency (of the well off probably beeing children of the well-off)is as old as mankind.
Just name a culture in which is was not true. (There are examples, but not too many, and most millionaires haven't begun as dishwashers)
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
12 Dec 14
Originally posted by ZahlanziMoreover, these sites are all too ready to opine without there being a site that presents the text of the judge's decision or even a relevent quote from it (that I can find). Confirmation bias, anyone? On its face it seems like bad law, but that's no more an informed judgement than anyone else's here.
it's incredible how idiotic the online media has become. in about 10 articles about this story, not one was able or willing to give a single legal reason why the parents should pay the entitled little ashole her college tuition.
the fact that a judge can wake up one morning and decide "today i am gonna set up 5 legal precedents unsubstantiated by actual ...[text shortened]... sychos using only faith healing. but a judge will force 2 adults to give money to another adult.
These opinion-leaders should publish the decision.
12 Dec 14
Originally posted by rwingettFor those who have a financial need, college can be free or almost free in the US too. Pell grants can cover close to what is needed for an in-state public college education. There are also many inexpensive alternative options for those who want them.
In Denmark, college is free.
It's just people who insist on going to expensive schools that have the problem.
15 Dec 14
Originally posted by sh76again, not the issue here.
For those who have a financial need, college can be free or almost free in the US too. Pell grants can cover close to what is needed for an in-state public college education. There are also many inexpensive alternative options for those who want them.
It's just people who insist on going to expensive schools that have the problem.
i don't care much whether she wanted 100k a year for harvard (or whatever the fee is) or 100$ a year for Hicksville's Hillbily University (Trademark).
the issue that is most important here is how a judge (adult) forced 2 adults to pay for another adult's bills. and, until someone can prove otherwise, how a judge made this decision without any law to back it up (other than another judge making a similar decision)