Originally posted by sh76The world cannot expect China to be the world's manufacturing base AND cut emissions at the same time.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hlFHlfH4ch0M4bTr15oijjInyyPgD9C6OO580
China will seek binding pollution targets for developed countries and reject similar requirements for itself at an international climate summit next month, China's top climate envoy said Wednesday.
I understand that China's per capita emissions are still lower t ...[text shortened]... r Copenhagen will be as worthless as Kyoto.
And that, my friends, is saying something.
We are being ridiculous.
We're the ones cutting back factory jobs so WE shoudl be the ones doing the emissions cutting.
We're a bunch of hypocrites.
Originally posted by sh76When China had their 1-baby law going, everyone was screaming how bad it was (in fact, I don't know if they actually stopped it or not, to be quite honest). But at least they tried to discourage population growth.
I thought we were supposed to be discouraging overpopulation in today's environmentally conscious World, not rewarding it!?
Personally, I'm all for global warming. The fast this ship sinks into a burning ball of fire and we all die screaming like pigs, the happier I'll be.
I also do kid's shows.
Originally posted by shavixmirI totally agree.
When China had their 1-baby law going, everyone was screaming how bad it was (in fact, I don't know if they actually stopped it or not, to be quite honest). But at least they tried to discourage population growth.
Personally, I'm all for global warming. The fast this ship sinks into a burning ball of fire and we all die screaming like pigs, the happier I'll be.
I also do kid's shows.
The sooner humans become extinct the better for every other species on the planet and for the planet as a whole.
Maybe climate change is just Mother Earth's defense mechanism kicking in.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraI'm not sure but maybe not to be f*@ked up by a miserable little species like us.
What do you reckon "the planet" wants?
Originally posted by The SnapperMaybe the planet really likes nuclear waste. What do you know about the preferences of a lump of rock?
I'm not sure but maybe not to be f*@ked up by a miserable little species like us.
1 edit
Originally posted by sh76http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8380106.stm
China will seek binding pollution targets for developed countries and reject similar requirements for itself at an international climate summit next month, China's top climate envoy said Wednesday.
China has unveiled its first firm target for limiting greenhouse gas emissions, two weeks before a global summit on climate change in Copenhagen.
Beijing said it would aim to reduce its "carbon intensity" by 40-45% by the year 2020, compared with 2005 levels.
Now what? They choose binding pollution targets, but weigh them by GDP which means China's emissions will still probably grow. At least it's something.
